I dreamt Peter got stunned walking into a Klitschko jab

Wrong...you lie again. I did not just make claims, or make a denial. I made honest statements that I stand by clarifying my positions. You are not capable of making honest statements.

 

You have yet to show a single case of a lie..

The fact that you appear to be getting quite wrougt up on this issue indicates that you perhaps like to dish it out to the 'Klit-ites' but you can't take it.


This is sad, because you have a bit more on the ball than the more typical Klit-haters who rattle on about Euro trash and ***s and Quitali etc.

You are at least as much of a Peter nut-hugger as any but the most delusional Klit fans (and we know who they are) are Klit nut huggers.

And while hater may be a tad strong, it comes down to definition. Many would term you a hater from what you've said.

And you only have one avatar.

If you devote its signature to the Klits, it certainly, at a minimum, suggests a little bit of Klit obsession.

Don't be so defensive.

Think a bit about what's being said here.

Nobody is out to get you.

 

Tell you the truth, whenever someone can tell it like it is, regaurding the KLIT's (in simillar fashion to how I described Peter, of course with different characteristic) I don't even think about referring to them as a KLIT-ite. They are not.

What are you defining as bias...actually liking a fighter...???

 

Please, I'd rather not use those offensive words.

I don't know that I'm "wrought up" I just think you are trying to hard.

You had to ignore my statements to post what you posted. That is a level of disrespect, I haven't shown to you, and still don't intend to do to other posters. I can disregard your posts and call you names too, but why...???

If you find KLIT-ite to be an inaccurate description of yourself, you have every opportunity to clarify where you stand (as I have done). But to ignore my positions on fighters in order to label me, and "get me back" by calling me something with "-ite" on the end is cheap, and is in itself a lie. Especially when you admit to following the dialogue. You know full well what I have said.

Besides, why not use another word to describe rabid Peter fans...??? Of whom I am not one. You might have fun trying to being original.

You can say "-ite", but it's a little obvious who you are trying to immitate.

 

In that case, allow me to direct you to one of my earlier posts regarding one of the Klits from a couple of months back:

[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1066844#post1066844[/url]


Am I still a Klit-ite in your books ?

 

I have not ignored them. I just don't believe them, and not because I think you lie. I believe that YOU believe them (hence my spiel about denial) but I don't. Your earlier statements as cited by IB contradict the sentiment of your denials.

You HAVE called me a liar. Idon't think i can recall calling you any names

As*already stated, by my standards and definitions, and those of IB and others, there is nothing false about what I have termed you. Perhaps definitions are the problem.

 

I have seen all of Vitali and Vlad's fights and I know how good they really are.

 

YOu shouldn't argue about definitions with me...I started "-ite"

I told IB what it is already, and how not to be one.

When you said you don't believe me you are calling me a liar...I don't care. You've cried about me calling you a liar all this time and still haven't apologized for being a....:|

 

I have alredy posted this link from two months ago:

[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/...44#post1066844[/url]

I have similarly tried to cool the ardour and straighten out certain Wlad fans who felt he would easily defeat Ali,

[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39341&page=2[/url] (See post # 20)

And there have been other occasions when i've tried to temper the enthusiasm of some of the more wide-eyed Klit fans.

You can search through my postings. It only goes back 500 though.

 

I'm afraid the '-ite' construction predates your birth. It stems from a Greek root meaning pertaining to or associated with.

Eg. The Nazis and other Hitlerites were anxious to overthrow the wiemar republic.

When I saw the Klit-ites in your avatar, I assumed you were using it in the sense that it already existed, rather than claiming the word as your own, with the rights of definition.

Consequently, i felt free to use the same (ancient) construction around Sam.

Hence Peter-ite.

Hope this clears up the definitional mess.

 

There are some blind bigots here who can only see the positive about Peter, what the Hell that is I do not know!

 

I'm familiar with the real "-ite"

This is the ESB one...


What do you want...you haven't said a thing about boxing in quite a while...

...if you want a friend all you have to do is ask.

 

Did you look up the earlier quotes I posted?

[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1066844#post1066844[/url]

I have similarly tried to cool the ardour and straighten out certain Wlad fans who felt he would easily defeat Ali,


(See post # 20) of

[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/...t=39341&page=2[/url]

 

No...you saw my initial ones and said you don't believe it...so why would I look at yours...??? To try and find something wrong with it...??? No, it would be to give you props.
But, you aren't giving me much chance to extend the olive branch, yet you want to shove yours down my throat.