I find it hilarious that people think Taylor can have success at SMW.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Amsterdam, Sep 13, 2007.


  1. SugarShane_24

    SugarShane_24 ESB good-looking member Full Member

    8,929
    39
    Jul 21, 2004
    I think this is a tad overboard. Taylor, talentwise, is still one of the better equipped boxers today. He may not have met the people's expectations, but he is still unbeaten and sitting on the throne.


    I for one thinks he may lose to Pavlik after seeing the firepower he displayed against Miranda. But getting a title at 168 is far from inconcievable.
     
  2. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    The fight could have been scored for Clottey, I agree. I in fact had it a draw, but officially it stands as a win for Margarito and a win for Margarito was acceptable.

    Margarito is garbage though, people went crazy over Clottey because he dominated him early. While he stood inside and bombed Margarito with fast combinations, this was more of a styles thing, it has no effect against guys who aren't going to sqaure up against him like Margarito and a shot Corrales.

    Realistically, I have nothing against Clottey, it's just that people who think he can defeat top class WW's in this deep division get on my nerves because his issue's are too large.

    Stamina/injury/fighting in spurts/flat footed.

    He also just doesn't hit hard enough to gain a top fighters respect, unless it's Margarito, in which Margarito was there to be bombed with his best shots in succession.

    It always gets on my nerves to see anyone get overrated overnight, and Clottey did because of the Margarito fight, some even still hold onto this, even with the glaring evidence that he's too flawed.
     
  3. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Hey, I'm far from a Taylor apologist. I hope Pavlik hands his ass to him on a plate. I hate Taylor as a person and I've rooted against him before. I just don't agree with Amsterdam's assessment of Taylor, and I absolutely don't agree that he's lost 4 of his last 5 (I have it scored 3 wins and 2 draws). In any case, I hope he does fight Calzaghe after this because it would be a huge payday for Calzaghe, a big step up for his legacy, and a relatively easy win, plus as the cherry on top I'd get to see Taylor dominated by a more likable figure.

    Against Calzaghe, Dawson would be his toughest matchup at LHW. It's also a high risk, low reward matchup, which is why I'd never expect to see it. H2H though, there are guys I'd have ahead of Dawson at this point. Getting rid of crazy Floyd Sr. was a big mistake by him - his defense had improved leaps and bounds under his tutelage, and since he has the best agility in the LHW division, the style suited him well. Against a quicker, bigger puncher than Adamek, Dawson would go down like a felled tree, and for that reason, I can't put him at the top of the LHW.

    No, Am's Taylor hate is nothing new, but he's certainly never expressed it at this level until now.
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,071
    84,878
    Nov 30, 2006
    That's fair, he did get an inordinate push by scared Margarito fans desperate to excuse their man for a VERY rough night that didn't do his "would murder Floyd" illusion any favors.

    However, I am about as far from a Margarito apologist as you are, and a) liked Clottey before that fight, b) had him winning, and c) still see him at least troubling, if not beating, many top ww's. I don't rate him top five or anything, but he can certainly hang with the top ten and make for very interesting, and for the most part exciting fights.

    I'd still love to see Clottey-Simms someday (a fantasy match-up of mine a year ago), even though Travis let me down hard against Alcine.
     
  5. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Clottey doesn't strike me as the type to deal with movers well. Simms let us all down vs. Alcine, but he surely can move well.

    I have no issue with real Clottey fans, but I have an issue with bandwagon jumpers who freak out after every 'surprise'. I picked Clottey to dismantle Margarito, he was on his way to stopping him, this was no surprise in the first 4 rounds.

    All overrating comes from 'surprise'. Calzaghe was overrated after the Lacy bout, now he's being underrated again, it's how it works. I try to stay straight-lined the entire time and try to be objective. But some people think that being a fan and then supporting the fighter and even providing analysis of why he does well against X ATG or what not is being absurd, but only because the ATG is held to a pedastool.

    I can provide footage of Hagler vs. Duran, many new fans haven't seen these fights. Take the same guy(Hagler), throw him in with Calzaghe, they will at least agree that Calzaghe would be landing shot after shot, teeing off on him...

    It's not bias, it's just analytical prediction.
     
  6. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    He has faced, beaten and hung with the best, thus he is one of the best.
     
  7. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    I'll accept your OPINION when you have some FACTS like Bute has hung with or beaten guys like Hopkins or Wright.
     
  8. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Taylor would win a wide decision against Bika. Just because Bika made Joe look old does not mean he is a good fighter. He would also beat Andrade and perhaps Carl Froch.

    A fight with Mundine (who I don't rate all that well) would depend on who fights less scared; Mundine could outbox him with superior speed, or he could fold mentally like he did with Siaca and to a certain extent Kessler and let a slower fighter win on effective agression/Mundine's chin giving out.
     
  9. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Bute would beat both at this point, badly.
     
  10. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    The skill level between Wring and Abraham are on different ends of the spectrum. Arthur is a decent Fighter with good skills, but Wink is a GREAT Fighter with GREAT skill...Yes Arthur is bigger and more exciting but that won't mean he can beat a truly great technician like Wright...

    I mean Abraham lost to Mirands (Not on paper, but he lost) and Miranda isn't anywhere near the skill level of Wright....All he has is power which is a great equalizer, but won't have you on top forever.....Boxers need depth to their craft and Power is god given. Wink doesn't need size to compete at 168 b/c he's right around that weight anyways.
     
  11. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    I seriously doubt he would beat Hopkins badly...I don't even think Bute would beat him.
     
  12. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Hopkins would **** Bute up.
     
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,071
    84,878
    Nov 30, 2006
    It doesn't take a great leap of faith to say that Bute would likely beat both.

    Wright's talent would be wasted at 168, he simply can't compete there the same way Shane couldn't compete with him.

    And when's the last time Hopkins fought a young, hungry fighter above middleweight?
     
  14. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Hopkins is too old. The Winky fight is not an indicator against a bigger, faster and more powerful man.
     
  15. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    That's with out saying.....Bute isn't anywhere close to Hope or Wink in terms of skills, expereince and craft. Bute is a fun guy to watch but so was Gatti. Bute is young enough to be a champion but like Gatti he will be a champion with many limits.