Well I was saying about HW fights in 00's! Brewster vs Lyakovic was also exciting but I find Lewis v Klitschko more exciting! In that night of 2003 Lennox sure didn't look like daddy either!
Yeah he was really beating him when he had to literally hang on for his life after being rocked by an uppercut shortly before the fight was stopped
:rofl So Brittley was officially ahead on the cards when he lost. Big deal. He was ahead when he quit against Byrd also. A fight has a scheduled round limit. If you're not healthy enough to finish the fight, through injury or cuts (from punches), you lose. Tough. It's alll part of the sport.
I never felt either guys punch so no comment on that, but Kirk's resume ain't much better than Peter's or Sanders'.
And your point is? Vitali lost. Fair and square. To an undertrained Lewis who hadn't fought in a year. End of story. The scorecards are irrelevant. They're only relevant to Vitali's delusional fanboys who want to make more out of his resume, so they talk about how he was good at "winning rounds", when he couldn't win the FIGHTS against the best opponents in his career.
The reason why Corrie seems more powerful than Peter is speed, when someone throws power shots so fast like that you simply don't see them coming and eventually get hurt.
Why is it every anti-vitali fan continually bleats on about the Chris Byrd quit incident I mean really have any of them actually SEEN the fight? He quit before he received long term damage and/or got KO'd through him being less than 100%. This content is protected
Yeah, Sanders is sort of like Zab Judah where he can hurt you with those quick shots that surprise you. The speed and southpaw stance.
Why is that all the Vitali fanboys always talk about how he was winning on points against Byrd and Lewis but was unable to finish the fight?? Vitali winning the fight up to that point (but not round 9) against Christina is irrelevant. He was unable or unwilling to continue and lost.