I had him up by 1 point as well. Vanes looked like a beast in his previous fights. Ouma made him look pretty ordinary.
I had it even. I wouldn't have had a prooblem with either fighter winning, bt the scorecards were utter bull****. I wasn't surprised though. I love Top Rank's idea of puttin bluechip prospects against tough opponents, but if those tough opponents can't win by decision WTF is the point?
Sounds like my view is in the minority (as far as the margin goes) but I had it 1. 10-9 Ouma 2. 10-9 Ouma 3. 10-9 Ouma 4. 9-10 Vanes 5. 10-9 Ouma 6. 9-10 Vanes 7. 10-9 Ouma 8. 9-10 Vanes 9. 10-8 Ouma 10. 9-10 Vanes Now I have a little dislexia and a I may have transposed the 8th and 9th rounds, however in any case the outcome is still: 96-93 Ouma
I had it dead even. could see how someone would give it to either guy but those scorecards were a disgrace. once again boxing looks corrupt....cause it is
I had same exact score as Toker. Break the fight down and no way Vanes won clearly like that. I bet African fighters its gonna be the same. Some things will never change.
