i have a problem with boxing fans.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slicknick56, Jul 11, 2007.


  1. myk

    myk Active Member Full Member

    534
    0
    Dec 5, 2006
    I agree but regarding Vic, how do you expect him to learn when he could not even accept his defeat?
     
  2. Grabonator

    Grabonator Active Member Full Member

    947
    1
    Apr 15, 2007
    You know what?? You are right!! Thats why fighter like Miranda and lacy should not be written off yet!! Back in the day there where great fighters with some losses. Even today there are fighter like Glen Johnson who come back after some losses and be better than ever, or guys like Michael Sprott who has 10 losses already but seems to be in his prime now. The great Hopkins lost one of his first pro fight but where does he stand now? Sprott is no elite fighter but hes better than ever i think. Fighter with zero losses are either super elite or dont have fought the best opponents they could! Some fighter have the ubeatable status but thats bull**** everybody is beatable, we are only humans! Today manny fighters are just overprotected and dont take unnessecary chances to face dangerous opponents.
     
  3. the_what

    the_what Bolo Punch KO Full Member

    8,031
    0
    Jul 20, 2004
    Im still waiting on Emmanuel Augustus to get his title shot. It would be a big '**** you' to the industry if he were to pick up a title with his record.
     
  4. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    That's why I dobut the "boxing" world would allow EA to get a title shot....and if they did, they make it a point to stack the odds against him.
     
  5. therealdeal

    therealdeal Active Member Full Member

    1,107
    1
    Jun 21, 2006
    I think it is a factor of the limited TV dates. An opponent with a 0 is much more attractive to a network than one with a few losses.
     
  6. unitas

    unitas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,062
    768
    May 12, 2007
    anyone who knows boxing knows the O is bull****.

    but for nuthuggers its a good tool to claim a fighter in invinsible......
     
  7. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Great post peter5, keep typing!:good
     
  8. Rollo

    Rollo Active Member Full Member

    1,404
    1
    Feb 1, 2007
    I think that there´s a contradiction here - which boxers has more fans than De La Hoya and Holyfield?
     
  9. Shpion

    Shpion IDF Full Member

    2,678
    1
    Feb 9, 2007
    Agree. Valuev had 0 until he started fighting a somewhat credible opposition.
     
  10. Street Lethal

    Street Lethal Active Member Full Member

    986
    31
    Jul 10, 2007
    It's not if you lose but how you lose and who you lose to.
     
  11. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Sometimes a loss can help a fighter move forward....a lot of fans don't realize this and look too much into the 0 and not who guys have faced.
     
  12. Beebs

    Beebs Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,226
    5
    Feb 21, 2007
    the phrase "undefeated" carries far too much weight in the realm of todays boxing, if you don't crucify a guy for losing a fight or two, you might get to see the top guys matched up alot more often, and fighters fighting much more aggresively.