I have a question about Pacquiao

Ya, possibly, a victim of his own success.

 

he souds so good in analyzing fights. previous ones and the future. but the thing is, pac keeps on eating up his predictions

*******s own him all the time. :rofl

 

He also said JMM-Pac II was draw, which by equates into a clear win for JMM. :good

 

Uhhh, how about if instead of calling him a victim, we call him what he really is. A ducker of random blood drug screening, a ducker of Floyd Mayweather, and a ducker of the BIGGEST pay day in history of boxing.

He avoided random drug screening like it was the plague. He came up with just about every excuse to avoid random drug testing.

His KO ration has gone up as he's gone up, contrary to laws of physics. Unless of course there are enhancers.

DLH, Mayweather, Leonard, Robinson, all have moved up in weight and have accomplished as much if not MORE than Pac, and we never doubted them, why??? Because it looked NATURAL, and the fact that Pac's UNATURAL transition into the higher weights is questioned more so for his refusal to submitt to random drung tests. :think

 

wow this dude is the naustradamas of boxing.

 

WTF!
I can understand why he doesn't want to come back. He cannot do any better than he's done before coming back may ruin his "reputation".

Thanks for the link.

Some posts there are funny looking back.

 

Why was PAc not ranked higher than Floyd is he was an atg at the time, and many of you said Floyd wasn't lol... Beating the champ at 145 lbs is not winning a real ww title. Floyd-Shane is the true and real ww title fight...

 

[yt]zuuH1wXL_jQ[/yt]

Some slight creative license.

 

*******s have no respect for other fighters and therefore I have no respect for them. As I say, a huge dump on their Pinoy faces.

 

If you found Enzo's post even remotely amusing then you should sign yourself into the nearest psychiatric ward. I'm trying to help, Jessy.

I have no issues with being proven wrong by fighters, it's all the more comforting that a great deal of critics, and highly knowledgeable posters also were proven wrong on more than one occasion. And no, before you ask, *******s don't qualify as highly knowledgeable, they taint this forum.

 

Tsk, tsk.

 

That youtube video was great, though.

 

I see another Divac in the Making.

So a sensible poster (relative to you of course) saying that it was a draw, means a victory for someone.


Like when Roach stated that it could have gone either way, Divac concluded that JMM won.

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected