I have a question about Pacquiao

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Apr 6, 2010.


  1. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    Who the hell said pac wouldn't agree? Pac agreed to a 24 day cut off instead of a 14 days and agreed to a blood test right after the fight. Bottom line is floyd never wanted to fight pacquiao. Get your facts straight :hi: 40 opponents no olympic style test...too scared to lose that 000000
     
  2. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    IMHO, anyone can look at his post fight from JMM to now and see that his facial features are "thicker". He looked almost "childish". Now he looks "primitive".

    Now I won't say that is decent "proof", but the fact he ran from drug testing and STILL has not presented a defense for this is enough circumstantial evidence for me.

    Manny is a cheat!
     
  3. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    :deal:deal:deal

    Case closed.
     
  4. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Jeez you are gullible. Pac and his team said it! Ask yourself this question, "Why 24 days and is there a valid reason for this date?" All the answers you come up with show you that Pac is full of it and a cheat.

    -- Original rules stated 0 days. Why even agree to terms and enter negotiations?
    -- 30 days was proposed by Team Pac, but quickly changed to 24 once video evidence was presented that showed they gave blood under 24 days.
    -- Team Pac LIED about 14 days being presented then admitted it was presented. So why did they refuse it?
    -- Pac gave blood for testing 20 days out for the Clottey fight. WTF? So why refuse a fight for 14 days if 24 days "matters"?
    -- Roach and Pac said giving blood makes him weak, but they were right back in the gym getting work after the Clottey test. Roach said so on a radio interview. Huh?

    So all the evidence is sitting right in front of your face. You choose to be ignorant. There is no shame in not knowing something. When you CHOOSE to not accept information? You are a fool. :deal
     
  5. d-mo

    d-mo Member Full Member

    238
    0
    May 14, 2009
    Manny is the OJ of boxing. But hey, OJ was innocent too...
     
  6. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    PacDbest Owns!!!



    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=33608

    12-09-2007, 06:35 AM

    G'damn this guy knows his ****! at that time i was even picking floyd by KO against pac. :lol:


    Pacdbest was saying that pac wasn't really that small of a fighter and that he can compete in the higher weights... now these same people are crying PEDs. :lol:


    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

     
  7. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Damn dude.....
     
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    The guy was a ****ing soothsayer. Bizarre!
     
  9. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Damnit, almost everyone in PacDbest's thread claimed a fight vs Hatton would be a career ending fight for Pac.

    'Hatton TKO6, Hatton by KO'.

    Weird stuff.
     
  10. d-mo

    d-mo Member Full Member

    238
    0
    May 14, 2009
    I will admit that that is impressive, but Ped's aside I have thought for a while he was a solid welter.
     
  11. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
  12. bulakenyo

    bulakenyo Am I a boxing fan yet? Full Member

    8,356
    20
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'll admit, I thought Pacdbest was going too far, making these predictions years ago.

    But I guess he knew about Pac more than me.

    Sad that they wont let him back in here.

    I got to talk to him some time back, and he's still cool.

    He wanted me to bump his old threads, but I told him the mods all locked it.

    Haha.
     
  13. slantone

    slantone Ring General Full Member

    2,793
    0
    Feb 27, 2005
    gawd i remember peoples opinions were universal on PacDBest. half were either inredulous and called him an idiot- and the other half felt sorry for him. NOBODY had the foresight to see what he saw. it goes to show how little we all know about boxing. Then again, even freddie roach then, didnt think his man would be able to face Mosely, or even Margarito- now he s confident his guy can beat them all.

    What impresses me is that unlike most guys now- PacDbests justifications werent just based on blind fandom- but on substantiated evidence and analysis= he says Pacs amazing gifts will be his counter to Floyds amazing skills- well thats what we re now just starting to say, 2 years, and many fights later- pac is now the favourite over floyd based on his physical abilities not his skills.

    well done PacDBest.
     
  14. slantone

    slantone Ring General Full Member

    2,793
    0
    Feb 27, 2005
    why wont they alow him back in?!?!
    goes to show the general attitude ...people not willing to admit they made a mistake perhaps!!??

    i for one - am willing to be the first to say sorry- and that PacDbest was right when i was wrong- and that we all sometimes think with what we know- rather than what is really possible.

    i guess thats why people like pacquiao achieve more than normal people- because they dont hesitate to believe.
     
  15. bulakenyo

    bulakenyo Am I a boxing fan yet? Full Member

    8,356
    20
    Jun 2, 2006
    He said he cant log in anymore when tried to go back here.

    And I think he refuses to register a new Pacdbest account.

    He's satisfied though, where he is posting now.

    And he pops up in PACLAND from time to time.