I have created my top 10 p4p

With IB, it's always intentional racism

 

I didn't notice it.

 

I said “MOSTLY” exterminated that’s factually correct.
Yeah You’d like me to go away …
Away just like the way of the indigenous.

there is at the very least a smaller talent pool because of the murderous ways of colonization.

facts
Happy Independence Day.

 

How is it white-centric if there are plenty of asians and latins. Do you read what you are typing?

 

I honestly responded as soon as I read it and didn't realize how old the thread was. My bad.

 

What has USKY done to be p4p4 1 instead of Canelo?? If anything it's a insult to talk about USKY and Canelo in the same sentence, Canelo has faced all big threats at 154, 160 and 168 and planning to go up to LHW and clean that division up, it's logical USKY should be behind Canelo,.

 

Usyk is not No.1 P4P and Canelo should have been listed in Top 5. The rest is O.K.

 

You don't "mostly" genocide people, extermination doesn't really work like that.

It's not a half and half type of thing.

You either do it or you don't.

As for the self pitying drivel at the end, grow up, you are embarrassing yourself.

 

Apparently, he woke up the next morning and realised how toxic his perspective was and he has apologised.

 

Sad, really, that someone has to live their life totally obsessed about such divisive nonsense.

 

Yeah, you're right. It is sad. Although I do want to make clear, I was joking about IB. He isn't racist lol

 

I wasn't really talking about him specifically, I meant generally speaking.

 

Look here amigo,

please educate yourself.
You have been TKO’d below. Have a nice day.

gen·o·cide
/ˈjenəˌsīd/
Learn to pronounce

noun

1. the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group
   "a campaign of genocide"
2. Genocide is an internationally recognized crime where acts are committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.

 

So, what you are saying is you mistakenly used two words with different meanings (genocide and extermination) as if they were interchangeable...which they aren't.

Sometimes, what you imply, what you infer, speaks louder than the content you supply.

In this case, you quite clearly tried to imply Europeans hunted these people and erased them from history - something verifiably untrue.

Again, you implied the reason we don't see fighters from those places is because they were literally murdered into extinction.

Which is provably untrue.

You have tried arguing about the definition of the word despite being shown you have used it incorrectly, and have failed to acknowledge that your premise was flawed from the start.

Those groups, Amazon tribes and Australian Aboriginal people, are not extinct - and when this was explained to you your response was that they were only exterminated a bit, like some genocide...sort of.

Which isn't what you implied.



The fact is both those groups are still around, and in the case of the Australians in reasonable numbers.

They were not hunted to extinction like animals, they still live today.

Had you said something like "those groups definitively suffered and their numbers declined" I'd have no issue.

But, you didn't, you used emotive language and tried to make sweeping claims which don't stand up to scrutiny.

The tribes in the Amazon have suffered as much in recent times through the expansion of logging companies effectively driving them into shrinking pockets as their natural habitat is chopped down.

Unfortunately, this doesn't fit your narrative so you wouldn't mention it even if you knew about it.

Anyway, it's tiresome arguing with someone who will never understand their mistake or is too arrogant to acknowledge it and be a grown up.

It's very simple...you just type "I, Hanz, made a mistake".

Not hard, is it.

Had you not started out this exchange in a condescending tone and tried to mug me off I may have even agreed to disagree.

Now, please, go away.