straight up Like he did to Taylor, to Groves Ggg is largely unproven GGG is all talk he won't fight at 168
Another GGG topic. You're almost as bad as that simpleton boxing_master/constable and his love for Mayweather. Almost. Some of you guys are so obsessed with certain boxers that it is genuinely disturbing.
GGG is no bum but your right he hasnt proven anything but knocking out b level op. thatll be great to see froch vs ggg great for boxing have it in the uk or mgm itll make money and ggg will be fighting for belts. i heard froch dont want the fight....
Froch would get UD 12'd by a guy like Daniel Geale. He isn't fit to lace GGG's shoes. And I'm not even a big Golovkin fan.
lemme guess. It is what it is. Copy and paste same **** thread from you. We all know you trolls do this for the post counts.
Froch is great, he beats almost anyone from 160-168, but he wouldn't have a clue about how to deal with GGG.
Froch is a C level fighter in terms of skills but A+++++++ in chin, stamina and toughness that he is always dangerous to the end.
I'd make Froch the favourite should this fight happen, which it won't. Also before any Yanks or GGG fan boys make the "England - location" comment, I was hoping Groves would beat him in both of there fights and GGG seriously impresses me. Froch is the larger guy, much more proven, is made of granite, comes on stronger the longer a fight goes on, can punch himself...