I have NO DOUBTS Wilder would Ko Povetkin!!!

Man you're making yourself look like an absolute fool here, keep it up.

I always bring out the idiot in you, and reveal your bias to the rest of the forum. :yep

 

I know you have reading comprehension problems, and you clearly have a low IQ but here's what I originally wrote.
"His win over Charr is better than anything Murray has done."

So what WIN of Murray's is better than Charr?

You seem to avoid this question .

Yes, you certainly do make me look like a fool, especially when I expose you for using words you've clearly never learned, or exposing your extremely low reading comprehension level . I find it hilarious exposing and humiliating you because you actually believe you're objective. It's funny just seeing you go full re**** and having a nervous breakdown when someone criticizes GGG/Wlad, but you wont bat an eye with someone criticizes a black boxer .

 

His draw to Sturm and "loss" to Martinez triumph anything Duhaupas has done in his career. But anyways, to answer your question his resume is chalk full of domestic levels, and Eurolevel guys who are about as good as Charr is relatively speaking. Desperately clutching for straws and nitpicking doesn't make you right, in the eyes of most boxing fans, and pundits Murray a top notch MW based on his fights with Sturm, and Martinez. Even if he didn't come on top in those on paper.

Keep clutching at straws man. :thumbsup

 

Not avoiding anything, look at Boxrec. Murray has quite a few Eurolevels and Domestic who are about as good as Charr. You're just desperately trying to bend logic here, and beat around the bush by pointing out that Murray on paper doesn't have very many good wins despite his performances that CLEARLY prove he's world level. This is your M.O I guess, beat around the bush and use circular logic when you're wrong.

 

You can't count a DRAW and a loss as doing something. Let me a word it more clear then. What WIN has Murray gotten that is better than Charr? Did that help you? . HAHAH full of guys as good as Charr, you say that I'm desperately clutching for straws, jesus christ, the hypocrisy and re****ation in this one is too strong.

Anyways, you always seem to avoid my subjects even though I address all of yours. Let's go back to one of mine. So I've criticized Floyd, Ward, etc, so tell me how have you criticized GGG, Lomachenko, Kovalev or whoever.

 

Povetkin / Wilder needs to happen SOON. After Wlad demolishes Fury, I want a rematch between Wlad / Povetkin with a decent referee. I want to see a decent fight between these two. Let it happen!

 

Needless to say, in the above scenario, Sasha starches Wilder. That's a given, in case anybody was wondering.

 

Well, this is all out there for the forum to see..... I think we both know that the vast majority will agree with what I'm saying and not you buddy.

Good night my stubborn friend.

 

Beat around the bush when I'm wrong . That's your go to move.
"His win over Charr is better than anything Murray has done."

Here's my original quote. Either way, a WIN over CHarr is still better than LOSING to a shot to **** Martinez that was annihilated by Cotto in his next fight, and a fight Cotto got 0 credit for. Unless you give Cotto massive credit for that fight, stfu. I bet you were the first one to discredit it.
Now stop going full re****. Bend logic and beat around the bush? LOL quotes my word, and don't make **** up like you love to do, and show me where I'm "bending logic, and beating around the bush".

 

Yes, I agree the majority of this forum are GGG fans(let me guess you're going to deny this too right?), so yes they will agree with you , what's your point. Seriously how stupid are you , it just baffles me how someone can be this dumb.

 

**** off ellerbe

 

little beouche.

 

wash my willy

 

you'd like that wouldn't you.

 

yes