I hear that Vitali's next opponent will be a tough contender with a legit shot to win

:roflatsch

Peter went 20 rounds with the Klitschko's and won 3. He sucks. Can we stop with the Sam Peter nonsense? You sound like Max Kellerman making such an idiotic comment.

 

lmfao

i know i waz juz ****in wit cha

 

:good

And 61.000 people didn´t want to wait of Haye. They want to see Wlad fight so he fights Chagaev.

 

Exactly.

It is hardly Vitaly;s fault that no matter whom he meets - it seems like they have no chance.

Vitaly is just toooooo good. He would probably get more respect if he was not as good and had to scrape by some close wins.

 

It was supposed to happen on Schalke, THE soccer arena. You cannot ask the soccer crazy Germans to step back with their Bundesliga for a boxer to recover.

It's like asking to close the Madison Square Garden for basketball for some months, because a ballett contest has to be re-scheduled. It simply will not happen.

 

The logic of the haters is stupid.

The Klitschkos are better than the rest and they can't create a fighter who is on their level out of thin air. Vitali is the only of all these aging comeback HW's who took on the a reigning title holder without tuneup. Nobody, not Ali, not Foreman, has done that in their HW comebacks. Let me guess, when he did that you probably criticised him for not earning his shot, right? He disposed of Peter, fought a mandatory, then the an undefeated challenger who created more interest in a HW fight than any other possible opponent.

Wlad has fought mandatories and top ten guys for years. Whom can they fight to please you?

Oh, and the statement that Chambers is a blown up cruiserweight:

Joe Louis won the title from Braddock who is much smaller than Chambers. 50% of Louis' career opposition consisted of cruiserweights so really he can't be called an ATG heavyweight, since he didn't have that many fights at HW, right? Ali struggled with Jones and Cooper, both smaller than Chambers.

 

wow, you couldnt have proven my point any better ramalinga, thank you. this is exactly what im talking about, samuel peter is a bum, a fat hype job created by money hungry marketers to make it seem as if he could beat vitali klitschko. How do I know this?? they compared him to a young mike tyson thats just desperation. and if you wanna pull the "true HW" argument out your ass like any fanboy that cling to the klitschkos testicles, look at joe louis's record against opposition thats 200 lbs or bigger, 17-0 with about an 85% KO percentage. and dont EVEN begin to compare that hack chambers to jones and cooper. and you say that vitali has never fought a tune up for a comeback?? well look at his competiton for one thing, a tune up fight nowadays would be somone on the lines of butterbean! you NEEDED tune up fights back then since the competiton was top notch. so back to the drawing board klit boy, this argument is tried and true.

 

We had no idea what exactly to think of Peter until Wlad gave him a boxing lesson. Then his shortcomings were painfully obvious. You are arguing with the benefit of hindsight.

At the time Wlad fought him in the title shot eliminator, Peter was universally recognized as the #1 HW challenger. You can't blame the Klitz for facing him, even more so as this was the official WBO/IBF title eliminator. The winner earned a title shot.

Do you give props to Lewis taking out Michael Grant? Before the fight, Grant was hailed as the next big thing. Until Lewis showed this guy that he doesn't belong in the Top 10. Do you cry now how Michael Grant was a bum and Lewis KOd a bum? Or did Lewis KO a universally recognized legit HW top contender?

 

no because lewis already certified his legacy by beating bruno, mercer, ruddock, morrison, holyfield, golota etc. he beat some of the most dangerous punchers that ever stepped into the ring, and michael grant was actually good, helluva lot better than sam peter i know that. his victory over grant was just an overkill , as lennox was already regaurded as a true champion.

 

She's taking the dishes. :bart

 

look, the klitschkos are indeed talented fighters and the poor opposition that they face today is not their fault. its just when you compare todays HW's to the HW's of the 90, 80's 70' etc, there is no comparison. the klitschkos are the only talented HW's today, one can only expect that individuals such as the klitschkos gifted with their physical attributes and athleticism, that they would dominate this poor divison. and judging from their age, their not gonna be around long enough to fight a TRUE competitor. Deontay Wilder would be the PERFECT opponent for either klitschko, as he is tall, athletic, and powerful. the only attribute out of those the current HW's possess today is "tall".

 

He-he. They weren't bums before the fight though

 

Fro the million's time! Opposition is not poor, they just way better than anyone else.

 

Grant is better than Peter? You, buddy, are a ******!

 

"fro"?? "THEY just better"??? dude, you owned yourself with this post, epic fail:roll: