I hear that Vitali's next opponent will be a tough contender with a legit shot to win

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Swann, Oct 5, 2009.


  1. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Haye - "Backed" out of the fights with both Klitschkos, probably due to most of his money coming from Setana.

    Povetkin - Injured himself, now wants a tune-up first.

    Tua - Beat a nobody, should fight a top 5-10 guy before getting a shot.
     
  2. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Chef, she/he only wants Wlad to fight someone else so he gets stripped of his belts.
     
  3. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    There's a good deal of truth to that.
     
  4. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    I heard at one point it was up to 8 weeks. Team Haye said they understood & would've done the same thing Wlad's Team ended up doing.
     
  5. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    :lol:
     
  6. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009

    well lets look at vitalis skills then shall we? vitali is slow, moves and stands like a half ******ed duck, and throws lazy half-assed punches. his style is to of many of the past HW champions advantange. sam peter is the definiton of a plodder, he comes in fights in terrible shape and gasses out quickly. chris arreola is just a mess and looks like one, never have i seen a "top contender" throw such ugly looking punches and posses little to know defensive strategy. he just whales punches at you praying one of them would eventually land, that strategy worked against the bums he fought, but when he fought klitschko, he looked like an amatuer. and vitali didn't look all the good either, arreola still manage to land some shots despite of the fact none of them were thrown properly. sorry bud, you just cant compare todays pilsbury doughboys to the HW's of the past, even the less skilled ones had more talent in their pinky finger then jell jugs arreola has in his entire obese body.
     
  7. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    then enlighten me k-man, you seem to know more about boxing than the next person :roll: how are todays fat-so's better than the competiton in the past?? but who am i kidding, your gonna use the "true HW" rebuttle like any other klit hugger. I highly doubt your able to come up with anything original.
     
  8. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    the top 10 HW's today have beer guts that stretch out to next week, they have a hard enough time trying to stray away from a big mac let alone beat competiton that isn't fatter then they are:lol: "carnea would lost"??? you men "carnea would los"E"???
     
  9. K-Man

    K-Man Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,282
    0
    Apr 24, 2009
    Fixed.

    BTW, what exactly do you expect from a stupid who first comes with "it's just their size! They're fighting cruisers!", and then "size doesn't matter, a 170lb from 1930 would KILL them !".
     
  10. K-Man

    K-Man Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,282
    0
    Apr 24, 2009
    Play in another kindergarden. The sheer idea that a brute like Carnera has anything remotely resembling fighting skills defies any logic, and hurts the trained eye. He would fare exactly like the Taurus Sykes and Julius Longs of today, since he really is JUST BIG. Nothing else. But of course, you will come with your usual bulletin board trolling routine, twisting here, stirring there, making illogical arguments, or plain claim "X is miles better than Y!", even when a 4 years old can see that's not true. Even a fatso like Arreola whom I wouldn't even like to imagine in a fight with Ali or Foreman would have knocked Carnera out of the ring inside 3 rounds.
     
  11. M.Alexander

    M.Alexander Tough Mofo Full Member

    1,230
    0
    Mar 22, 2008
    Sorry but you little idiot knows nothing about that sport....you are the next clown on my ignore list. **** there are really dumb people on that board.
     
  12. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    6
    Mar 14, 2007
    Oh snap, you caught a typo. And your typing is perfect. You win the argument.

    Yeah, this guy was in so much better shape than modern heavyweights, and at 5'9" or so, would easily knock all of them out.

    This content is protected
     
  13. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    and what exactly have proven from writing all this BS?? you say i cant make a decent argument yet you write a paragraph of mindless ramblings, way to completely contradict yourself buddy.:roll:
     
  14. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009

    HAHAHA!!! he is in better shape than most heavies!! you see jelly jugs arreola or beer gut sam peter in that kind of shape?? nope. thanx for showing this pic, keep em comin klit boys. im sure you can pull something out of your ass EVENTUALLY
     
  15. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,766
    Jul 21, 2009
    Seriously dude, you need to quit wachting boxing. It's not for you.

    Go out with your buddies, maybe try go getting laid. The world is wide open for you. No need to focus on boxing.