I just rewatched Morales-Pac 2...

let me remind you pacteron what happened....

you dont glorify someone for winning a bout against a 1 eyed fighter. he couldnt even put pac down with all the stamina and strength and skill you guys are claiming about... :rofl :rofl

when you did this to a guy more than once..... that is owning

This content is protected

 

just truth hurts eh pacteron.... pac owns your best fighters :rofl :rofl :rofl

 

and he fought a 1 eyed pac :yep :yep :yep

 

go play in trafficatsch

 

Pac is very very good.

But holds wins over 2 legends that were past there best.

Morales
Barrerra
The rest.

 

Youre a ******. Morales was shot and the Raheem fight was an indication.

 

Morales became shot because Pacquiao destroyed himthats the truth, if Morales would of showed up like he did in EM/Pac II against the likes of Valero,Soto, and JMM at 130 Morales would win hands down.

 

his wins are mostly a beatdown by a combination of 10 kd's or more from those 3 best fighters... that means something :good

 

You need ot rewatch that fight, Morales fought a stupid gameplan against Raheem, he tried to box early and didnt gain any steam until he started to brawl late in the fight.

 

That's why he won against Barrera, Raheem and Diaz, oh wait, he didn't!atsch

 

Read the above post for Raheem, Diaz he was already destroyed then

 

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

His third fight with Barrera was more grueling, more harmful than his first fight with Pacquiao.

U funny.

 

you are a moron... you got carried away on the first fight where he won a fight against a 1 eyed fighter :good big mistake for glorifying a fight that is nothing special :deal

 

Anyone who says Morales was prime against Pacquiao doesn't really know boxing or Morales.