I just rewatched Morales-Pac 2...

the guy got em avatar.....

he said em was schooling pac before the cut.... what a comedian :yikes

 

**** outta here.


[YT] <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rN1o6mmXoJQ&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rN1o6mmXoJQ&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YT]


Stop with the stupidity. Pac could never beat Morales prime for prime.

 

Morales victory of Pac in their first fight is more impressive than any of MAB's victory's, but they're still neck and neck on any of my All Time P4P lists. Morales and Pac's first two fights are what really jettisoned my interest in boxing.

 

Oddly the same fights that sparked my boxing flame.

 

Pac was lucky that Morales was done and shot.Manny would never beat a prime Morales at any 122,126,130.:deal

 

Yep pac:!:

 

Yes...Imagining could make a lot of difference!
You could even imagine Morales beating pac in one round if you want..

I've asked myself who is actually better mab or morales..

IMO.... for resume wise, mab is ahead but if you talk about mab vs morales (talent, skillwise, technical ability etc..) I tend to agree with you that morales might be slightly ahead!

Now, the discussion will be interesting if you add JMM in the list. Yes, we know resume wise, JMM resume pales in comparison with mab and morales but telent, skills and technical ability... your buddy divac is more than will to defend JMM should you try to down grade him as a boxer :hey

 

Oh and by the way, Pac coudln't knock Morales out with all his arsenal when Erik turned soutpaw and took all Pac had to offer. So the cut aint no excuse...

 

Morales, regardless of his career finale, can always say he was the last guy to truly beat Pacquiao...and pretty much at his own game, as well.

Although I felt JMM beat Pac in their last fight.

 

Please, youre on Pac's dick 24/7. **** man you even said Pac would be Arguello prime for prime on another thread so you have absolutly no cridibility......Get the **** out of here....

Here's to refresh your memory

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=64360&page=3&highlight=pacquiao+arguello+prime

 

Lucky is not enough to knock out Morales 2x, win over mab 2x, Ring magazine champ, # 2 pound for pound before pbf retired, etc..

Lucky is used for gamblers not for top boxers!

Get over it! More on with your life buddy!

 

Sounds better

 

Yup! PAC lost the first fight (first chapter) but that is not the whole picture between then.

Their fight has three chapters..

The whole world knows how Pac avanged his loss with VENGANCE! I don't need to eleborate on this

Watch how pac demolished Morales in the next two chapters! Thats the whole story about PAC vs Morales..:good

 

The point is that Morales was past prime in the first fight, and shot in the second fight. I don't dispute the facts you mentionned but i tell it like it is and you have to agree on the fact that Pac was in his prime for those fights while Erik was not...

 

:nod morales wasnt in his prime when he fought pac in the first fiht and gave pac all he could handle and beat him. in the 2nd fight he did it again and even when pac took over from the 6-10th round there was times where morales just gave him hell and took it to pac again but he just was out of breath and culd only do flurrys.

im not knocking pacquiao at all hes a great fighter. but its easy to see a prime morales beats pac 9/10. he knew to throw that jab. to make pac go back. to smother him and not let him get off first and when pac gets comfortable and starts to flurry...go at him as well.