the cut sustained by pac on that fight was nothing compared to the cut he suffered in the first morales fight and this happened very late in the fight. i think you better re-watch the first fight between pac and erik.
And after all his wars with Barerra and hard fight with Morales and other tough fights took a lot out of him. Look st his fight after beating Pacquiao, he clearly wasn't himself against Raheem.
He was lackluster even in the 3rd Barrera fight, the commentators made more than a few mentions of it.
hmm... so, he was winning after just 4 rounds... that very nasty cut happened in the fifth... and whether you like it or not, that cut had a great influence in determining the outcome of that fight.
He already showed he posed stylistic problems for Pac before the headbut, so its not as if it turned the fight, and to argue any different just shows bias.
So if Raheem had the exact same fights as Morales, and fought some tough fights then Raheem would be in his prime to?
I have yet to see anyone beat Pac handily. I must have half a brain and was molested by a gang of Polish terrorista's in another life...
...and that wasn't a prime Pac either. In fact that was a pac jumping up from 126, throwing 1-2's, prone to be wild and off-balanced, and not to mention was fighting on one eye. This guy said he sees a prime EM beating Prime Pac 9/10 times?...what's the basis? I luv EM to death but man, but don't disrespect EM by disrespecting Pac. That was his best win but that was far from the best version of Pac.
Good point. But you are talking about Morales here. Pacquiao is nothing compared to him, as what they say. Pac's prime (according to them) is when he jumped from 126 to 130 and got beaten by a shot Morales. Just imagine how great Morales is, he is already shot yet he beat a prime Pac in their first fight. Morales fans are indeed very logical.