I just rewatched Morales-Pac 2...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by saul_ir34, Jun 28, 2008.


  1. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    This post makes little sense for a number of reasons, but I will leave you be.
     
  2. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    the cut sustained by pac on that fight was nothing compared to the cut he suffered in the first morales fight and this happened very late in the fight. i think you better re-watch the first fight between pac and erik.
     
  3. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Morales was winning the fight before the cut.
     
  4. Monticello

    Monticello Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,012
    1
    Apr 2, 2008
    And after all his wars with Barerra and hard fight with Morales and other tough fights took a lot out of him. Look st his fight after beating Pacquiao, he clearly wasn't himself against Raheem.
     
  5. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    He was lackluster even in the 3rd Barrera fight, the commentators made more than a few mentions of it.
     
  6. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    hmm... so, he was winning after just 4 rounds... that very nasty cut happened in the fifth... and whether you like it or not, that cut had a great influence in determining the outcome of that fight.
     
  7. Larson

    Larson Paenkhay Full Member

    2,747
    0
    Dec 7, 2007
    Get off it, Pac lost fair and square to a near shot Morales.
     
  8. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    He already showed he posed stylistic problems for Pac before the headbut, so its not as if it turned the fight, and to argue any different just shows bias.
     
  9. Monticello

    Monticello Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,012
    1
    Apr 2, 2008
    So if Raheem had the exact same fights as Morales, and fought some tough fights then Raheem would be in his prime to?
     
  10. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    45,024
    13,007
    Mar 5, 2006
    the argument to end all arguments: Scoreboard
     
  11. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Mr. Jim Rome I didn't know you posted here.
     
  12. PaoloP4P

    PaoloP4P Member Full Member

    311
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    I have yet to see anyone beat Pac handily. I must have half a brain and was molested by a gang of Polish terrorista's in another life...
     
  13. carras

    carras Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,596
    0
    Jul 22, 2004
    just watch the first fight, and that wasn't a prime morales...
     
  14. PaoloP4P

    PaoloP4P Member Full Member

    311
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    ...and that wasn't a prime Pac either. In fact that was a pac jumping up from 126, throwing 1-2's, prone to be wild and off-balanced, and not to mention was fighting on one eye. This guy said he sees a prime EM beating Prime Pac 9/10 times?...what's the basis? I luv EM to death but man, but don't disrespect EM by disrespecting Pac. That was his best win but that was far from the best version of Pac.
     
  15. hmi

    hmi Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,257
    0
    Sep 14, 2007
    Good point. But you are talking about Morales here. Pacquiao is nothing compared to him, as what they say. Pac's prime (according to them) is when he jumped from 126 to 130 and got beaten by a shot Morales. Just imagine how great Morales is, he is already shot yet he beat a prime Pac in their first fight. Morales fans are indeed very logical.