Or it is because Toney was shot and can only look really "good" against Peter in the entire top of the heavyweight division. Why? Because Peter can put you to sleep with ONE punch, but when he has to combine his punches and put everything together, he looks like a mess. :good I seriously doubt that Peter got better, I think it was the fact that Toney got worse
Oh yeah, Toney was shot. I'm not on the Peter wagon here, just saying all around that was the best he'd ever looked. He was quite motivated that time out is what I mean to say I guess.
two were in one round, making it 10-7 [some judges score a two kd round 10-8] rather than two 10-8 rounds. That makes a pretty big difference.
115 - 111 peter is a JOKE. peter lost 5 points in round 2 and 3. there's no way he took every single round except for these two, also, he lost the two rounds, no matter whether mccline didn't totally beat the **** out of peter like that many knockdowns maybe suggest.
It's funny how much hype Peter receives, regarding his power. He's a plodder, a clubber like Shannon Briggs said.. he needs to hit you with that one bomb, and if you can eat one bomb at a time, you will not get KO'ed by Samuel Peter. Just about every trainer in the world has called Peter's flaws for a very long time, he can't sit down for more then one punch at a time, his combinations are useless flurrys that looks good to the eye but has virtually no effect. In fact, there's quite a few fighters out there that are better punchers then Peter.
Exactly, it was a boring snooze fest... the little that was done in this fight was done by McCline :good