Yes but when he fights a guy who determines he fights in a 20 or 25 ring instead of a 10 or 15 ring lets see how great he cuts the ring. When he fights a guy who can dance for 12 rounds, let see how good he cut off the ring. When he fights a guy in the top 10 who his power won't hurt, lets see how great he is. Frankly the best fighters have never been pure power fighters and never taken as much hits as GGG. When he fights top ranking fighters, he will take 2 punches, then when he goes to land 1 the guy is gone and they land 2 more, then 2 more, then he is on the floor. And it must be true because it rhymes. What is this non-sense saying a shitty fighter sucks is now hating. We all recognize that wilder is fighting bums, so is GGG.
You're just another idiot who I come across in school. Thinks they know what they're talking about but don't study at all. Can't wait till he- and whoever you doubt- proves you wrong.
Are all the good trolls banned or on holiday, or what? I haven't seen a decent troll thread in months atsch
Yeah, I really don't know what the TS is talking about. Macklin did land a clean right hand, that actually appeared to stun GGG briefly, but nothing else really...
Really, so name 1 fighter in the top 11 he beat, because Macklin was rank 13 and its the best guy he fought. Rather than just say you feel, rankings can't be based off your feeling. You can't say I feel Toronto raptors should be ranked #1 because they have such potential. Rankings should be based on who you beat and your actual wins, not on fights that never occured, otherwise why have matches if we assume we already know a 12th rank fighter will beat a 2nd rate fighter, by that logic people like tyson or ali should get title shots in their 2nd fight.
Maclin dropped Sergio. GGG didnt feel anything from Maclin and looked pretty dam good. I suggest that you go talk about tennis or golf because you know absolutely nothing about boxing.
Where exactlly did you hear that Macklin was ranked 13? It wasn't by any chance Boxrec - who now (since the loss) have Mack at 13 was it? You truly are making a fool of yourself. And how is your 'system' supposed to work? - Only 4 fighters had beaten Macklin so logically Macklin shouldn't be lower placed than 5. Only 1 person's beaten Jr and that was no1 Martinez so he should be no 2 - right? atsch Did you even stop to think before you started banging away at your keyboard.
Another **** with a few posts comes on with a GGG bashing fans and the other toads like derrick and cletoris van damme jump in. Well, america's dumbing down, why not ESB.:verysad
You drive a hard bargain kid. Triple G is a solid boxer with a good foundation with his very extensive AM pedigree. Then we have what everyone is talking about with regards to this guys power. The great equalizer. Impressive would be the first word that comes to mind when talking about this young champion. Macklin is a good fighter who was thoroughly dominated by GGG......the same guy who gave Martinez all he could handle when they faced off last year. Different styles produce different outcomes but there was a huge disparity in how both achieved a win over MM. Again. .....styles make fights but calling GGG a shitty fighter couldn't be further from the truth.
Being ranked 12 is for up and comers or vets who are solid......not a world champion kid. New to the sweet science?