I keep watching that Holt v. Torres round...oh man...what a round!!!

Seriously, are you that thick? Forget about who is to blame for the clash of heads and concentrate on the fact if clearly put torres on ***** street in a fight he was dominating to that point. THAT is what matters. Not who is to blame.

 

What is your point? That doesn't mean anything. The fact of the matter is the head butt put Torres at a very, very severe disadvantage. It was accidental, i didn't say it was Holt's fault, did i. You'll notice your reply doesn't actually address any comments i made, and that i don't necessarily disagree with what you are saying, but what you are saying is essentially irrelevant to the fight.

 

You are just plain stoopid aren't you!!!!!

 

and he continues to harp on the same irrelevant points.. not worth wasting time.

 

You bitches on here talk about irrelevant.... Not only was the headbutt unintentional. But ****ing Torres INTENTIONALLY cracked off a power shot on an opponent after a knockdown. Who the **** hits a guy after they get up from knockdown. That was a blatant foul. The thing you bitching whores dont realize is that Holt was not hurt by either knockdown, how the **** can you say Torres was winning the fight when they were still in round one and Torres was just fighting with reckless abandon like a ****ing amateur. If Holt was on ***** street(even from that punch after a knockdown which you can be DISQUALIFIED FOR?) then you would have a point. But the fact he was not hurt in the slightest and started to move his head and counter. If Torres did not lunge in with his head he would of got caught with that left hook by Holt anyway. NO ****ing way can you say Torres would of won the fight based on two knockdowns in which the guy was not even hurt in either.

 

No-one's crying about it because it was only a glancing blow and didn't basically decide the result of the fight the way the head clash did. Had Torres KO'd Holt with that blow, he'd have been DQ'd and quite rightly so.

 

[quote="TKO";3709046]No-one's crying about it because it was only a glancing blow and didn't basically decide the result of the fight the way the head clash did. Had Torres KO'd Holt with that blow, he'd have been DQ'd and quite rightly so.[/quote]

Glancing... :rofl the punch landed ****ing flush. More so than any other shot during the exchange of elbows.

 

there should have been a rematch for this one

 

why?

 

I was hoping for Torres victory and I do agree that headbutt caused a lot of damage and ****ed up his equilibrium but from that angle it looks like he regained the equillibrium and was knocked out by the right hand. So the headbutt made some damage but the right hand finished him so dont say that it was the headbutt that koed him.

 

This guy is a crack head but I gotta admit that he is right here.

 

Some really, really stupid posts here.

Noone is calling corruption or attacking Holt, just stating what anybody with functional eyes can see: The headbutt left Torres helpless. The headbutt determined the outcome of the fight, it was over at that point.

 

to blame Torres for the headbutt is absolutely ridiculous. If you have to fault someone - which you dont - you have to fault Holt, for clearly ducking and rising head first. Watch the footage, there was NOTHING that could have landed aside from his head. No punch could have conceivably landed in that exchange, either a headbutt or nothing. How is that Torres' fault?

 

This :deal

 

[quote="TKO";3708271]I'm not trying to play any card. I'm calling it how I see it. I am not a nuthugger of either guy. I'm fully aware that Torres whacked him when he was down and that he's not the cleanest fighter ever either. But you simply cannot knock somebody out with a headbutt- right hand combo and then claim it as a legitimate victory IMO. I'm sure team Torres would claim that it was Holt who wanted no part of the rubber match as well, it's just one of those things.[/quote]

Nope, Torres pulled out of a 3rd potential fight. Holt was ready to go.