I know this topic has been beaten to death, but...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mr. magoo, Dec 4, 2008.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,956
    24,916
    Jan 3, 2007
    If Joe Calzaghe were to call it quits tomarrow, and never return, where would some of you guys rate him?

    Personally, I'm having a hell of a time with this one. On one hand, I love him to death. He's unbeaten in 46 fights, and has won a handful of titles at all different levels, ie. regional, continental, world, etc. He also has an incredible workrate for a guy his age and is a truly remarkable boxer by my standards.

    On the otherhand, his record seems to be missing a signature win over a truly great fighter at his absolute best. What's more, his wins over very old versions of Jones and Hopkins were not terribly decisive ( though he did deserve the nods, and he's no spring chicken himself.)

    I just don't know. I suppose I would have to rate him just a tad below the likes of people like Leonard, Hagler, Hearns, and Duran. But, place him closley on par with fighters like Michael Spinks, Mike McCallum, Donald Curry, etc....

    Of course, he is a damn near impossible fighter to rate, and the fact that he's still active doesn't make things any easier.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,853
    47,758
    Mar 21, 2007
    Way, way below Spinks. Way below.

    Around the same sort of level as McCallum, above Curry, but tag something on for remaining unbeaten. I don't care what level you are at,it speaks of great mental strength.

    105-95.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,956
    24,916
    Jan 3, 2007

    Okay, we can scratch the idea of him being rated on par with Spinks. Though I do think that the experssion "Way, way below", is a tad far fetched...
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,853
    47,758
    Mar 21, 2007
    I had Spinks just outside my top 50 and Calzaghe scrathed from consideration for my top 100 in preference of the 5 or 8 names that just missed the cut. This was before his career's best win over Hopkins, which pitches him firmly into consideration for the 100 IMO.

    So I see real daylight there.
     
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,956
    24,916
    Jan 3, 2007

    I agree that the Jinx deserves a higher rating over Calzaghe by virtue of his unifying the LH title and becoming the first LH champ to capture the HW crown. He did however, have far fewer fights and was basically done at a much earlier age. Additionally, Calzaghe though having a smaller group of quality names, probably spent a larger portion of his career facing ranked fighters ( of course, I could be wrong and I'm sure that it can be easily checked ).
     
  6. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Hard to rate indeed.... on one hand, he's unbeaten and while he fought too many second raters, he does have quality wins. A bit like Roy Jones perhaps.

    He beat a peak Kessler quite decisively. I'm not sure if Kessler will retire as a great fighter, but he's an excellent boxer for sure. Plus, how often do you see a great beat an excellent boxer at his peak? Lacy is another win like that, although Lacy is less accomplished. Hopkins was old, but he proved how good he still was by winning every round against Pavlik afterwards. I don't think the Jones fight enhanced his legacy much; Jones was done.


    He's hard to rate, but his ring generalship (adaptability) ranks with the best i've ever seen, as does his workrate, the unorthodoxness (southpaw, weird angles), his handrate, his chin and and dedication.



    p.s. I thought the Hopkins fight was a clear, though somewhat close, win, especially when the latter started faking low blows and tried every "trick" to turn the tide... as for the Jones fight, it wasn't even close in my opinion.
     
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,956
    24,916
    Jan 3, 2007


    Sadly, Calzaghe gets ****all credit from most people for his win over a prime Kessler. I thought it was a legacy builder myself. And on the Jones and Hopkins fights, I concur that he won clearly, but unfortunately these wins are commonly overshadowed by the fact that he was dropped by aging fighters in both those matches as well as the claims from disgruntled fans like " he just ran and slapped his way through those fights". Let me make it perfectly clear that I don't agree with this nonsense, but it seems to be the concencus of a lot of posters, particularly in the general forum, ( for whatever that's worth ).
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Hard to rate, he was purposely steered clear of many top contenders at 168 for many many years. I could give you 20 names of top10 men he didn't face while facing the Tocker Pudwells of this world, during this period he was a laughing stock even on the British forum and wasn't even top20-30 P4P.

    1997-2000 gave some decent contenders and ex titlists. From 2000-2006 (before Lacy) he has 1 worthwhile fight in the shape of Mitchell, that fight was stopped with Mitchell throwing the last shot of the fight, protesting the stoppage having KD'ed Joe prior to that.

    He arguably lost to Hopkins and Reid. Hopkins and Jones were particularly old at 43 and 39 and this hurts him. Lacy has turned out to be a C Level gatekeeper type and his legacy largely depends on what Kessler goes on to do.

    However unbeaten in 46 fights with unification against Lacy and Kessler with names like RJJ and BHOPS puts him up there probably with a Toney or Delahoya
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Agreed plus the 'shots' that did land didnt land clean, were scuffed and were slaps. I'll take a flush neck snapping straight right over 3cuffed slaps an day of the week
     
  10. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,956
    24,916
    Jan 3, 2007

    Fair enough, but missed shots or not, he still threw ( and landed ), a hell of a lot more punches than Hopkins did. The compubox stats were not even close. You tag on some of the crap that Hopkins was pulling later on such as false claims of being hit below the belt or whatever other theatrics, and I think the outcome is close but clear. The knockdown gave Hopkins the edge early, but he did little or nothing else for the rest of the fight.
     
  11. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Like all just-retired fighters, i think he will get more recognition as the years go by.

    Something else that just crossed my mind: most great middleweights had their signature wins over smaller fighters. I.e., Hopkins had De la Hoya and Trinidad (though Pavlik was a legit middle). Hagler had Hearns and Duran. Monzon had Napoles, Valdez and Griffith. Calzaghe's main opponents were the same size.


    And on him slapping: he does do that, but he mixes in plenty of real punches as well. And if he did this kind of damage by just slapping, he's the world pimp champion for sure:

    This content is protected




    This content is protected
     
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,956
    24,916
    Jan 3, 2007

    True, Calzaghe defeated men who were indigenous to the same weight class as well as even reaching to fight a few guys who were above on occasion. Hagler was outboxed by Leonard who hadn't fought in three years and was fighting for the first time ever at 160 Lbs.
     
  13. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Yet Tarver and Glen Johnson stopped a Jones who was 3years younger. Bare in mind he landed around 1000shots on Lacy, the fact he didnt put him away says allot. If my girlfriend slapped me in my face 1000times I'd probably look worse than Lacy let aloen punched, then again she maybe a HW she never tells me her weight

    Interestingly scuffing shots that arent clean sometimes are more likely to cut than clean solid shots with the way they grave the skin. Jones Jr's corner was bloody awful with the job they did on that cut
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Pre1990 SMW-LHW was 1 weight class. Should we talk about all the men he didnt fight in his 168 weight class:
    Otke (unified champ - beat more top men the Joe during the period)
    Beyer (long time WBC champ)
    Mundine (WBA champ and long time top10er, would he have beaten a faster more athletic boxer?)
    Green (WBC interim and long time top10er)
    Glen Johnson (pulled out 2-3 times)
    Reid rematch (arguably lost wouldnt give a rematch and fought worse opp)
    Froch (top 10 prospect, called him out for the last 3-4years)
    Echols (fought Brewer who was clocked in 2 by Echols the year before)
    Vanderpool/Larson/Tate/Nariello (more top 10 guys he didnt face)

    NOW BARE IN MIND HE ONLY FACED TWO TOP10 GUYS FROM LATE 2000- EARLY 2006

    Then theres:

    Prime RJJ (actually admitted in an interview he didn't fancy it - fair play)
    Pavlik (actually lied about offering Pavlik a fight when he didnt)
    Tarver (could have got the fight a few years ago)
    Dawson (current number 1 contender to JC's ring title - will he take it?)

    Joe may have beat most of these but he didnt want to take risks that would lose his ZERO. This has to be accounted for, avoiding risks to your unbeaten record shouldn't bolster your claim
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,853
    47,758
    Mar 21, 2007
    Agree about the corner. Has there ever been ineptitiude like that at the highest level?

    But PP - what do you think of the fact that both Kessler and Jones say they were hit harder than they thought they would be? That Joe's punches carry steam?