I lost twice to the following ATG; can I still be ranked ahead?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ironchamp, Jan 12, 2011.


  1. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,037
    Sep 5, 2004
    Some fighter's just have your number, others simply catch you at the right time. In any case is it possible for one ATG to lose to a fellow ATG not once but twice and still rank higher in the same division?

    Lets examine a few cases:

    Frazier lost twice to Foreman, is it possible to rank Joe ahead based on him cleaning out the division and having a consistency in his reign?

    What about Holyfield and Riddick Bowe?

    Tyson and Holyfield?

    Dempsey and Tunney?

    Arguello and Pryor?

    Moore and Charles @ 175?

    Discuss.


    Edit: I want to specifically exclude situations which are passing of the torch scenario's which is why I wanted 2 wins or more when both fighters are still considered relevant.
     
  2. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    There's no doubt Arguello is ahead of Pryor in an all time regard.

    Holyfield is above Bowe clearly in my opinion. They both have one legit win a piece in that series, I don't particularly give Bowe a lot of credit for the third fight. He deserves credit for one of the best performances of the decade in the first fight however. He simply didn't have the resume or consistency of a Holyfield to compare in terms of greatness.
     
  3. alexvoce

    alexvoce Guest

    Norton beat Ali 3 times if u take out corrupt judges.

    Frazier beat Ali twice if you get rid of dodgy ref "i couldnt do anything about Ali's holding behind the head."
     
  4. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    553
    Feb 17, 2010
    Griffith and Benvenuti

    Basilio and Fullmer
     
  5. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Mosley and Forrest/Wright?
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
  7. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,037
    Sep 5, 2004
    You Rank:

    Frazier over Foreman?
    Tyson over Holyfield?
    Moore over Charles at 175?
     
  8. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that a reasonable argument could be made for all of the above.
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    I rank Holyfield above Bowe.
    I rank Holyfield above Lennox Lewis.
    I am also inclined to rank Frazier above Foreman.
    I rank Dempsey above Tunney.
     
  11. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,616
    321
    Feb 23, 2008
    Canzoneri lost twice to Ross, yet I would still rate him higher at 135 all time.
     
  12. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    119
    Oct 9, 2008
    Barkley bested Hearns 2 X, but Hearns is still the greater of the two on the whole.
    :deal:bbb

    MR.BILL:hat
     
  13. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    Mayorga-Forrest
    Forrest-Mosley (Although I think Forrest is the better boxer)
     
  14. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,616
    321
    Feb 23, 2008
    Ray Robinson- 2 losses to both Paul Pender and Gene Fullmer
     
  15. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Vernon Forrest was just the perfect foil for Mosley it seems, style-wise. Shane couldn't get past him as an amateur or pro.