I love how Calzaghe Nuthuggers are worried about biased judges and refs.....

actually the major nuthuggers are saying it won't matter.

 

This post sums up what the experts are knowing.

 

I´m a JC fan, and to be honest I don´t expect this fight to be that lopsided many other fans seem to think.

But I do not worry over the judges...if it becomes a close fight the decisions doesn´t always go your way, but the chance of a robbery is pretty much equal everywhere.

True robberies doesn´t happen that often....and I don´t think there will be none either way in this fight.

JC UD

 

Yeah...B-hop will always be a hard nut to crack.

Even though he´s older he´s experienced enough to cover up a lot of that.

IMO the fight will doubtless go the distance with Calzaghe ahead, but not at all that easy...he will have to work for it.

Let´s hope for an excellent display of the sweet science ! :good

 

The judges shouldn't be stretched on this one

 

He won't be robbed, he will win every single round, other than possibly the first one or two rounds.

 

Bull****, Taylor vs Wright was not a dirty affair.

 

way to argue via insults. Taylor might have lost that fight, but if Hopkins is so skilled, why couldn't he outbox Wright like Taylor did for PARTS of the fight?

 

It doesn't matter if Demetrius Hopkins refs the fight, and Oscar De La Hoya judges, he's getting a beating

 

Nothing could be further from the truth. Hopkins was a lot more active in the Wright fight than he had been in years. He was moving and making Winky chase after him. And he never got tired. He also threw 600+ punches.

And the fight wasn't close. If you score fights based on shots with absolutely nothing on them, and Winky might've made it close. But if you score it based on hard and effective punching, Hopkins DOMINATED Wright.

 

8 rounds to 3? And you're talking about the JT/Winky fight? :nut