I love the Anti-Mayweather hate on here

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MasterCalzaghe, May 13, 2008.


  1. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    Hatton went after Collazo's paper title cause he saw him as a weak titleholder. . . then he barekly squeeks out a decision that coulda gone the other way.

    What did Shane do to Collazo?
     
  2. ganchozurdo

    ganchozurdo Active Member Full Member

    900
    0
    May 8, 2008
    if he wanted to beat up on little ricky so bad he should have vacated the wbc title and fight little ricky at 140 not 147 ricky dont deserve a title shot at 147 based on the collazo fight,, so because FRAUD beat a non ranked WW in little ricky dont expect for him to get too much credit for that win when right now litttl ricky will get trashed by every top 10 WW so FRAUD win against hatton on his 147 resume means absolutely nothing
     
  3. Sedona

    Sedona Active Member Full Member

    871
    0
    Sep 18, 2007
    As was the case with Ali, history will be kind to Floyd...very kind.
     
  4. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,275
    36,535
    Jun 23, 2005
    It didn't matter if the fight was at 154, 147, 140, or 135 Hatton was getting his asskicked in that fight period and he knew it that's why he ducked PBF for years, so he could cash out and he did.:deal
    Naw you're the dumb mother****er who keeps getting owned! I guess you really don't hate PBF huh? Just his fans right? You're too easy.:hi:
     
  5. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    Shane was in the running to get Fraud as well as Hatton and Cotto.

    Seeing as Hattons only WW fight at the time was a real struggle with Collazo and what Shane did to Collazo - its very obvious who the weakest threat was at 147 between Shane-Cotto-Hatton.



    Since you act dumb as a stump Ill give you a hint to the answer. . . . the weakest threat was Hatton. :hey
     
  6. G_RapPBF

    G_RapPBF Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,985
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    Shut the **** up. There was no talks of Floyd vs DLH only in the fact Floyd was calling out both their asses after every fight. BOTH of them, and neither of them wanted Floyd at that point. Not until the Baldomir match and Floyd won the undisputed Welterweight title did he get a shot at De La hoya.

    You really are a lying little ***** arent you?


    :rofl Floyd didnt decide to fight Hatton until Hatton called him out on Pay Per View. 5 months later. Boy are you really stretching it. We have proof Shane ducked Mayweather. But you say Mayweather ducked Mosley only because he fought Hatton.
     
  7. TroubleLurks

    TroubleLurks **** spell check Full Member

    2,765
    0
    May 23, 2006
    Shane also called out Floyd after the Oscar fight.
    "I don't fight no sparring partners" - PBF
     
  8. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,275
    36,535
    Jun 23, 2005
    What the **** does PBF the P4P champ need to go down in weight to face someone? He'll go up in weight like he did when faced Oscar and fought him on his own terms but no way in hell would he go down. Props to Ricky for actually doing the right thing calling PBF out and coming up top 147 and making the fight. Maybe if your hero Cotto would call out PBF and make him an offer, like Hatton did he could get handed his first loss as well.:lol::hi:
    BTW your opinion means absolutly nothing because PBF won Ring 2007 fighter of the year, the second time I might add...deal with it bitches.:deal:lol:
     
  9. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    As usual...you lose TRACK of the topic. Ramshall was talking about 147. That's what I was talking about as well. Hattonm sayong no @ 140 doesn't even mean ANYTHING to the topic at hand, and that's Floyd @ 147. Still with me slow boy? Nothing you said is fact or relevent. If anyone's easy, it';s you becuase you aren't very intelligent. I'm sure you're aware of that.

    Hatton, despite winning a belt in controversial fashion @ 147, was NOT seen as a top WW no matter what he was ranked. But you stick to the ranking, and mention the belt because that's all you got to go with. **** man, how many times do I need to tell you: "LEARN TO ****IN READ!!" That way you'll at least stick with the topic at hand and NOT add all this crap that is irrelevent. At least go get a GED *****.
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004

    Do you think adding that little wave gives you're post more cred? You use that more then anyone else here I would guess. Grow up boy...
     
  11. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    Are you seriously this stupid? Basically, you're saying Floyd called out BOTH, but Shane ducked FLoyd because he deferred to DLH.

    Wow...call out two guys, that way ONE will always be the ducker. You are a ****in ******.

    HOW the hell do some people think they actually make sense? I guess just as insane people don't know they're insane, stupid posters don't know better either...sad.:-(
     
  12. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    Youre a complete moron or nut-jockey. .. maybe both.

    DLH wanted Fraud cause he was the #1 p4p, not for the linear WW title. or he coulda easily got Baldy in the ring and probably beat him. . . but Baldy was not even top 20 p4p guy you idiot. :deal


    Well Margarito called out Fraud every chance he got and Fraud ran like a coward after saying to his face that he would fight him . . .so calling out is really meaningless. Or maybe Bruseles and Sharmba "called out" Fraud - thats why he fought them too. :lol:
     
  13. G_RapPBF

    G_RapPBF Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,985
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    How did Shane defer to Oscar 2 years before the fight happened? :lol: :lol:

    Are you saying 2 years prior to the Oscar Floyd fight happening Oscar told Shane to not fight Floyd? ARe you honestly implying that?

    Shut up coward lol. You havent debated one point on here all day. Why waste your time here? Im sure there are some soccer or cheerleading websites you'd be suited for better then here.
     
  14. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    Why do you act like it was a full two years? Little Floyd's been calling DLH forever. It became more feasable and doable only LATER in Floyd's career.

    Besides...did MAyweather even offer Mosley a contract? Or do you really think just mentioning a name means something? Floyd's called out a ton of fighters. Hell, most boxers do that. Serious offers are made through their managers. Not through an interview little boy.


    :roll: Yeah...you're real smart.
     
  15. sambob

    sambob Active Member Full Member

    1,312
    0
    Dec 11, 2007
    WHY DOES IT MATTER HOW GOOD HE IS AT 147? HE SPENT THE MAJORITY OF HIS CAREER AT 130 LBS FOR ****S SAKE!

    Wow get a clue. Are you saying that Hatton looked worse at 147 than he did at 140? He was in tougher fights, but it had nothing to do with him magically being a worse fighter at 147. On the night of the fight Hatton weighed the same when fighting in the welteweight division, as fighting in the junior wellterweight division. This means that the only difference between Hatton fighting at 147 and 140 is that at 147 Hatton has to cut 7 lbs less weight than at 140. So if anything he should have more energy.

    And as far as the whole Hatton is no good at 147 thing...... this argument was done to death afte Mayweather-Hatton. I can't believe people are still whining about Hatto losing.