i may be stubborn or even silly,but i believe pac should fight marquez again!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rochsolloch, Feb 26, 2009.


  1. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I would like DINAMITA's take on this. "Destroyed". interesting.

    I'll make sure it is bumped so he can see it.
     
  2. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006

    you think a 122-126 prime morales would have beaten a 135-140 prime pac? :patsch
     
  3. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I think we saw a past prime version beat a close to prime Pacquiao. In fact, that is indisputable.

    I have no arguement with Pacquiao being favored over Morales, but this Pacquiao would "destroy" any version. Nope.
     
  4. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006

    yeah, regardless of the judges' error, the draw is very much acceptable, since that was JMM's best perormance. But saying JMM got robbed is stretching it.
    A great performance by an underdog against somebody like Pac will make you think like that.
     
  5. tampa

    tampa Active Member Full Member

    992
    0
    Apr 24, 2006
    no let him fight someone else.

    paquio vs hatton or
    cotto
    mayweather
    valero
    mosley

    i know there are more but im little buzzed right now:rasta
     
  6. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    both fights were close but we all know it was not marquez who was robbed during their first fight. It was pacquiao..if the damn judge knew his damn job then he would have scored a 3 KD 10-6 instead of a 10-7 :patsch:ko
     
  7. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006

    that 29 yr old version of morales is good enough to beat any other SFW that time. :deal

    In fact pac was still a one dimensional speedster who only throws jab, jab, straight and who can easily be outboxed by a smart skilled boxer like morales. Do you think morales didn't knew that flaw in pac's game? :nono that is why he took the fight coz he knew he could take advantage of it... but still pac took morales to hell. Add the fact that pac has some in and out of the ring issues during that time.

    morales beat a one dimensional pac... fact! :deal

    pac learned from his defeat and improved his game added some right hooks and improved his jab. that made the difference during the second fight.

    Morales is a great 122 and 126 fighter... that was his peak, he never carry his greatness in the higher weights. Pac was a great fighter from 122 up to his current weight. that's whats separates them and that what makes pac a notch higher when it comes to greatness and legacy.
     
  8. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    nobody got robbed...the fight was a draw which i agree it shoulda been a draw...
     
  9. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    yeah but you have to admit that the judge indeed commit an error.
     
  10. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    ... i was interested before but now?! not so much.. you know why?! do you really believe pac haters will give pac credit if he beats jmm again?!

    c'mon... we'll just hear jmm is shot or something..we'll hear JMM would have... could have..ALL OVER AGAIN!:yep