I pose this question to fight fans who remember how great fighters fought in their...

Correction....he wasnt fighting great fighters anymore after he moved from 130.....You saw how he boxed Castillo's ears off in the rematch...too bad you're boy cant adjust his style to accomadate his shortcomings and clearly beat Marquez even once.

 

Seriously? You guys are taking this ***'s post seriously? :rofl

Anyway here's an info about ***llege.

[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=158354&highlight=Dumbest+poster:hi:[/url]

GO ***LLEGE!!

 

i almost thought you were an objective poster

you just dont like pac:yep

 

you are right it dont mean everything but Manny is made some minor improvements and I say his prime started between 2003-2004

 

:thumbsup hes always been.

 

Which weight in your opinion has Pacquiao looked as good as Morales has at 122 where he is considered by a lot of people as a top 2 or 3 ATG at the weight ?..... he has had 1 fight at 135 & 1 fight at 140 vs Diaz & Hatton so it cant be those weights... he was ragged as **** at 122 & below so it definitely isnt them... he went 1-0-1 vs the only relevent opponents he faced at 126 (MAB & JMM) so it cant be that... he lost to a past prime Morales & got a gift vs JMM at 130 too + let a past prime Barrera last the distance when he was there for the taking at that weigt so it cant be that.....

Which leaves 147... where he had 3 fights vs a ghost of a DLH who hadnt made the weight in numerous yrs... Clottey, who took a predictable 12 rd points defeat & Cotto who arguably lost to Clottey (tho this was technically a 145 lb fight)

C`mon... Morales at 122 was greater & better than Pacquiao has ever proven at any weight.... its Manny`s weight jumping that will have him higher on ATG lists... not being spectacularly great in any one weight.

 

lol at flhomos and haters feasting on pre primed 0ne two punch pacquiao with a headbutt

LOL

This content is protected

i am sorry ******ed world boxing anus champ, you have a kiddie class to attend LOL

 

Bill. Morales looked better against Ayala, Hernandez, and Barrera in 2002 than many of his performances at 122lbs?

 

who is the dumbest poster in the gen. forum.


View Poll Results: Who is the worst poster in the General Forum

Finito: in jin chin. the load his mom forgot to swallow. 14 15.05%
Radab: JMM. prom night date spurned by JMM. 11 11.83%

This content is protected

Eze: PBF. Pbf is god and infallible. 10 10.75
:rofl:rofl

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

We weren't talking about longevity and dominance and all-time standing at one weight though, were we? You were saying that Morales was a better all-round fighter in terms of performance and effectiveness at 122 than Pac was at any weight, were you not? Unless I have misunderstood. Now if the question is has Manny proved as much at any weight as Erik did at 122 or does Manny rank as highly in the all-time stakes in any weight class as Erik does at 122, then the answer would have to be no, simply because Pac hasn't stayed in any weight class for a long stretch. That is simple and rather obvious. However, if the question is actually what I believed it to be, who was the better fighter on their best night, then it has to be Pac without a doubt. Morales was a great fighter at 122, but he was not on the same level as Pac from 135-147. Morales was dragged into a war with Wayne McCullough in his 122 prime, and took a lot of punches, and edged home around 8-4. Think what 140 Pac does to a McCullough-standard fighter?! Morales was versatile, he was strong, he was excellent all-round, that is beyond question. But Pac is another level. To lose 1 or maybe 2 rounds at the most over 24 rounds against two of the best welterweights in the world in Cotto and Clottey, while being substantially outweighed by both on the night, is exceptional, nigh on legendary stuff. Who did Morales beat at 122 that was as good as Cotto or Hatton or Clottey? An ancient Zaragoza? Junior Jones? Don't make me laugh mate. And although this will lead us into a tired old argument that I'm not remotely interested in having yet again - Barrera clearly beat Morales at 122!!!!!!

I know you're a diehard, and good on you, but the current version of Pac is clearly a better fighter than Morales ever was.

 

we all know. its black and have veins.

 

Quote:
NALLEGE
The greatest ******
of ALL TIME

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: floyds dick
Posts: 12,723
vCash: 1000

This content is protected

. when they all told you to "go to hell ******", you resorted to claiming you were world champion boxer for the attention.
now you dont have the time to write legitimate articles but you got the time to write 50 posts a day on how to lick a black fighters balls.
[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/...est+poster:hi:[/url]