Bad comparison with 100M sprinting. Bolt is dominating in a strong era maybe the strongest. Asafa Powell more sub 10s, 9.9 and 9.8 than anyone ever in history, Tyson Gay has the fastest wind assisted time sub 9.6. currently 9-11 Sub 10 runners active this season going in the world champs.
Its not weak for the former Soviets and Russia. The US athletes are more interested in basketball, football and baseball.
Tony Thomson, Ibragimov, Chagaev, Brock, Austin. All low level guys in terms of talent who shouldnt be fighting for the title in any era. Names like that make me look at Ruiz as something godly in retrospect.
Guys like Maskeav and Briggs come to mind as well as Donald who really beat Valuev, this with out a doubt is the worse era of HW boxing ever. **** I thought Ruiz and Byrd were bad until I saw Peter and Arreola....:rofl:rofl:rofl
Heabyweights are a very weak era, Welterweight rules boxing. They are the only division keeping it alive.
Ruiz and Valuev are nothing special but they are just being propped up at the top with their bogus belts and rankings because they have the connections. No doubt either Klitschko would destroy Ruiz and Valuev with ease. Many other legit top 10ers would beat them as well. They are politically propped up, decent but fraudulent beltholders. Dont let Ruiz and Valuev distort the big picture. I don't buy that widely believed notion that the best athletes are going to NBA, MLB and NFL. they always went there. Boxing always got the castoffs. Ali could do no other sport but box, he had no hoops skills. Tyson could do no other sport either, they say he played hoops like a frog. Lewis was a good all around athlete. Holyfield and Foreman had no apparent achievements in any other sports. Boxing always got the leftovers. Michael Grant was supposedly a good athlete but didn't make it in hoops and started boxing late. Brandon Jacobs tried boxing but didn't stick with it, he must not have been that good. It seems the best ahtletes like Julius Erving, Tony Dorsett, LT, Ray Lewis, Kevin Garnett, Brian Urlacher, Mario Lemeiux, Jimmy Connors, Tiger Woods, Shaq, Alonzo Mourning didn't have what it takes to put on the gloves and fight.
He woulda been champ, if he knew what he was taking before the Ruiz fight, BTW a young Ruiz is better than a high % of today's top 10.....:rofl:rofl:rofl
Klitschkos would have easily stopped Tex Cobb, Renaldo Snipes, Tillis, Wagner, Berbick, Weaver, Jimmy Young, Page, Quarry, Spinks, Chuvalo. Louis' bum of the month anyone? The reason US commentators such as Atlas are claiming heavyweight divison is weak is because their fighters are not on top. Atlas trained Grant and Kirk Johnson!
You're right, it's not a weak heavyweight era. It's the WEAKEST heavyweight era. At the least it's the worst since the mid to late 50s when Marciano retired and Floyd Patterson spent a good portion of his reign defending his title against journeymen like Brian London or guys making their professional debut. (Granted that was largely because Cus D'Amoto didn't want Floyd coming anywhere near anyone who was a threat, and there were good fighters around who simply didn't get a title shot, like Williams, Machen, Liston, etc).
Dream on......... wishful thinking gets one nowhere. If America fighter won heavyweight title, suddenly the haters would start screaming that this is the best heavyweight division ever!
Yes, like how everyone says that Tyson fought in a strong era. :roll: Stop hugging Klitschko balls, get a life, and learn a little boxing history. The Klits are good fighters, but their competition is ****ing pathetic.
I used to think so but not so much anymore. How could it be a weak era when today's athlete in every sport is bigger faster and stronger, why should boxing be the exception? Also today we have a world sport, not just a sport mostly practiced by African Americans, so of course we are seeing the best of a much larger talent pool than at anytime in history.
this era is no worse than the early 1980's era Post Ali and Pre Tyson. Actually the similarities are stunning.