I re-watched & scored Whitaker v Chavez !

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bill Butcher, Sep 2, 2010.


  1. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    I know this has been done to death but what hasnt on here ? :think

    I have never sat & studied every rd with no sound before, I usually just enjoyed the 2 best fighters of the last 20 yrs having the balls & ambition to go at it (you hear this **** Floyd n Pac ? :twisted:) but last night I scored the fight & here was my score.....

    R1 10-10 Even
    R2 10-9 Chavez
    R3 10-9 Whitaker
    R4 10-9 Whitaker
    R5 10-9 Whitaker
    R6 10-9 Chavez
    R7 10-9 Whitaker
    R8 10-9 Whitaker
    R9 10-10 Even
    R10 10-9 Whitaker
    R11 10-9 Whitaker
    R12 10-9 Chavez

    117-113 Whitaker

    Ps. Whitaker has a strong case for winning every rd bar rd 2 & possibly 12, he just seemed to see it out but still landed more than enough & looked comfortable.
     
  2. BENNY BLANCO

    BENNY BLANCO R.I.P. Brooklyn1550 Full Member

    10,718
    9
    Mar 8, 2008
    I hate even rounds, if you were forced to choose who won rounds 1 and 9, who would you say won it?
     
  3. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Did you Micky Vann it in round 6 (take away a point without the ref's instruction)?
     
  4. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    That was about what I had it. I was probably the only person in my neighborhood who thought Whitaker would win. In fact I had always said he was the man who would beat Chavez at any weight. Bad matchup for Julio, who was a grind-you-down kind of fighter. Translation: he has to hit you clean and often to beat you down. The lightweight Whitaker was darn near unhittable. There was no way Chavez was going to ever hit him often enough to slow him down and beat him.

    At 135 Whitaker wins 10 of 12 rounds, imo.
     
  5. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    I always try pick a winner in each rd, if anyone deserved rd 1 it was probably Whitaker but I dont feel neither did enough or troubled each other enough to deserve to be ahead in the fight.
    Rd 9 was probably the most action packed rd with both men having their moments & answering each other, I genuinely cant separate them in this one & if I did it would be unfair to the man I went against.... if its even, its even IMO. Why give one fighter more points when the other fighter did just as much ?
     
  6. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    No, this was a very close rd that could have gone either way & was only split on my card by a couple of well placed Chavez punches near the end of the rd.
     
  7. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    I see it the other way around, I think the LW Chavez gives Pea a nightmare (& vice versa), Chavez`s reflexes & speed had diminished a fair bit from 1987/88 when he was at his peak & as seen in the fights following their actual fight in 93, was more past his prime than Pernell when they fought.

    I`d toss a coin if the 87/88 JCC fought the 89/90 Pea at LW, a REAL draw might very well be on the cards in that one IMO.
     
  8. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,292
    53
    Jun 12, 2007
    Wait a Minute! Beating an aging Welterweight Chavez is one thing. But facing a prime Lightweight version is an entirelly different animal. Pernell barely outpointed a one armed Buddy McGirt in thier first fight. He earned the win by the way. But do you really think he would completely dominate a prime Chavez?! Would Whitaker be as durable as Meldrick Taylor? A prime Chavez body attack was brutale. if he couldn't land to the head. a body attack would be fierce.
     
  9. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    Hi Califa. Yes but remember, facing a prime lightweight version of Whitaker is an entirely different animal as well. He was much harder to hit at 135 than at 147, where he was hit with much more regularity.

    Was he as durable as Taylor? Moreso I would say, a fact that he proved beyong a doubt when a shot, drug-ravaged version of Whitaker took the fight to and literally flung himself upon Felix Trinidad, who was probably the most feared puncher in the game at the time. He had little to offer anymore but still got up every time he was hammered to the floor and attacked. At the final bell he was on his feet. I would lay you 10 to 1 that Taylor would not have finished on his feet under the same circumstances.

    BUT...Whitaker wouldn't have had to be as durable as Meldrick Taylor because he wouldn't be trading with Chavez the way Taylor was. I see him making the much slower Julio miss and peppering him with counters. And whatever Julio did manage to land I don't see Whitaker having too much of a problem taking. If the bigger, stronger and harder hitting Trinidad couldn't take a has-been Pernell out then I doubt Chavez could take out the prime version.

    Just my two cents
     
  10. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    Whitaker/Taylor is about as inept a comparison as they come.
     
  11. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,292
    53
    Jun 12, 2007
    iBy durable I mean if Whitaker can stand the physical abuse a prime Chavez could dish out. Whitaker might not want to trade punches, but a prime Chavez will get his. Unlike Trinidad, Chavez is not a one punch knockout artist. Ha attacked to the head and body equally to devistating results. Not even saying Chavez would win for sure, but one yhing is certain. it wouldn't be a lopsided affair.
     
  12. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,787
    11,385
    Aug 22, 2004
    It's revisionist history to say it was an "aging welterweight" Chavez Whitaker faced that night.

    I seem to remember everyone thinking at the time that Chavez was very sharp and dominant going into the fight. Not a soul talked about any impending fall from grace. Yes, he fought a couple pounds over his usual fighting weight.......and by that I mean literally a couple. He weighed in for Whitaker at 142. To hear his apologists talk today, you'd think he waddled into the ring looking like John Goodman.

    He walked into the ring an undefeated, dominant champion, and this many years on, he somehow had turned 50 years old and half decrepit the night before the fight. :roll:
     
  13. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    The Chavez Whitaker beat was a very good fighter indeed, p4p quality stuff for sure but you have to admit he never really looked any good after that fight & its not as if he was ruined by Pea, he was outboxed, not beat up. His previous 6 or 7 fights leading up to the Whitaker fight were vs opponents that were not on his level & folded without much resistance, hardly ideal preperation going in against your p4p rival.

    The last time Chavez had to get up for a big fight vs another big star was in his 81st fight vs Camacho (Pea was his 88th fight Im sure) he looked great in that one but should have stepped up his comp before the challenge of Pernell rather than guys like Terrence Alli... Whitaker tackled fellow p4per Buddy Mcgirt & learned what a tough fight was before heading into the biggest fight of the era vs JCC, he treated Chavez with maximum respect & came in at his best for sure, full credit to Pea, no-one else could have did that kind of a job on that version of Chavez IMHO.
     
  14. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I just wait for anarci coming in claiming Chavez was shot and the fight still really was close or even a draw. :D
     
  15. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    :think I wouldnt say he was shot but he was on the downside and he shouldnt have taken the fight at Welter,which is a weight Whittaker was already comfortable with. Thats 2 advantages to Whittaker. This is one Whittaker fight i woulnt mind watching again havent seen it a long time but i believe i had this 116-112.

    Like Califa said this fight would have been more tight(Pick em) if Chavez was in his prime or if this was held at LW or JW.

    Hey Bodhi dont you have some thread about how great Max Schmeling was to post on:huh