Why don't you cut this cheerleading **** out and actually make a post on how he does it. Just listing some qualities does not mean **** either. Saying he's too fast doesn't mean ****. Saying he's never lost before doesn't mean ****. Man up and tell us all how Mayweather would win. Anyone can say who wins. Only those that know this sport can say how. Unless you're fine being nothing but a cheerleader. Eze at least wrote down how he thought Mayweather won. But if all you're going to say is "Mayweather vs. Baldomir" then you're nothing but a waste of time.
Dude, you thinking Margo could possibly beat PBF is a waste of thought. How the hell do you think PBF is gonna let a one dimensional fighter thats not even on his level as far as talent and skill goes, beat him. Like I said, if these guys both weigh in at 147 on fight night, PBF KO's the guy.
all I have to say is at the time of the stoppage Mayweather was well ahead on scorecards so Margarito had no chance ... or 120-108 on all 3 cards
Margarito is too slow ... Margarito doesn't have good defense, footwork, or boxing skills ... no way he lasts.
Exactly. Footwork, defense, speed. He doesnt even come close. And guys overrate his stamina, its not like his stamina is very good, its just his will to keep fighting even when he's tired.
The only way I see Margarito winning is to man handle Floyd into corners and hit to the body ala Castillo. Get in close and hit him with a right uppercut which he is vulnerable to. That's how he would win with sheer volume.
You and fitz are two of the most clueless posters here. You over estimate Mayweather so badly it's like you two don't even watch him.