When have I ever talked **** about Nick ya ****ing ****!, All I said was he's scared to fight Mayhem [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4NIdYYhTVY[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0531IYH3oQ[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RePYEMammDM&feature=related[/ame]
Yeah true, but his sub defence against an undoubted master like Jacare was not to shabby right? He's pretty good on the ground to, nearly subbed Jake Shields in their title fight
Yes I agree, you gave an excellent example, but I consider Diaz a master in this regard as well, the fight could very well turn out like the example you gave except Miller would have to survive 5 rounds instead of 2.
The example I gave was to highlight the error in your original statement. I could post the Shields fight to highlight your other error in judgement that Miller is untested in fights over 3 rounds too if you want. Because I seem to remember Jake having difficulty subbing Miller over the 25 minutes as the fight went to a decision
I know this fight and Shields was containing Miller more than going for submission attempts. And again you are using a loss to prove your point, if you do have a point to make.
Ok now your trolling, I never said this, its good, but your example of his sub defense involved him being on the sub-defensive for most of the fight.
Ive never made a case for Mayhem winning apart from it wont be easy for Nick either. Presumptive statements are annoying arent they? I think we should leave this here, you are getting boring now
Then once again, I wasnt responding to you, but there are people here who said Miller would woop Diaz and have no trouble with his grappling. And yet its not them you felt the need to correct. :think