Not because he's a fine opponent, but because Floyd just beat the p4p #2. That fight was pretty bad, but that's not the point. The point is, there's nothing wrong with following up a hard fight with a reasonably soft one. If you take your #1 contender, which Floyd did, I generally have no problem with any opponent right behind that. He did, so he can. After Sugar Ray took the title from LaMotta he had about five soft defences on the spin. It's normal and reasonable.
He's not only ducking Kell Brook, he's ducking his son Shawn Porter, and his son Devon Alexander, and his son Jesus Soto-Karass to fight his son Andre Berto :-(
Difference is though, Robinson's soft opposition probably took place in the space of about 2 or 3 months of about 15 fights he had that year. And I would guess he didn't put it on PPV either.
if it wasn't made PPV, I don't think anyone would complain, but $65 for non-HD coverage of this fight is a slap in the face for boxing fans, the only good thing about this card is the Salido-Martinez rematch, it will give us some action before the Floyd-Berto snoozefest
No dude. You can't compare the two. Mayweather only fights twice a year. Sugar Ray fought once every fortnight. They pretty much chose to fight instead of spar back in them days. With that said, Berto is still fine IMO too. He's not very good, but Mayweather fought the guy that everyone wanted him to fight (albeit a bad version). So, he can choose who he wants to fight. When Mayweather fights, you don't necessarily have to purchase it. Go to a friends house or a sports bar. Don't support Mayweather by paying for it, dummies.
You can compare it with any situation you like. It can be Toney takes on Barkley, then matches Chavers and Thomas. It can be Ali beats Foreman then fights Wepner. It can be Leonard beats Duran then fights Bonds. It can be Calzaghe fights Hopkins, then shot Roy. The point is, I don't think it's a problem. You fight one for the world and one for you - if that pattern was maintained, boxing would be in a far, far better state. The way I see it, Floyd is owed a soft one if he fancies it. The problem is if he takes two or three on the spin.
If its actually his retirement fight, I couldnt care less who he fights, especially after fighting Pacquiao. If he comes back then it is a poor fight. I wont be buying the PPV so I dont really care. Although the undercard is shaping up pretty well
Agree that Berto is fine, although I don't buy that Pacquiao was the p4p #2. After getting iced by Marquez (in seemingly "career ending" fashion), he beat Rios, Bradley and Algieri ... a nice little comeback but I don't see how that establishes him as p4p #2. I'm not sure how people have these p4p ratings figured out. Mayweather-Pacquiao didn't look like much of a fight to me, not a great performance from either of them. If that's the best they can manage, I don't want to believe they are the two best boxers p4p on this planet. That depresses me. Yes, Berto is fine. Credible enough as a gimme. It makes no difference to me, I have no intention of watching Mayweather. I don't see the fascination with him. I find it amusing how he's so revered and marketable in America where Klitschko (and the heavyweight division) in America has long been castigated for being "boring".
He will come back. It will be Pacquiao. They just need to find someone suitable to build a "new, rejuvenated" Pacquiao up on. Get that pot of gold growing again. Unless Berto actually wins this thing. That might be the plan. I wouldn't put anything past them.