In the dudes last 4 fight's he's unified 3 WW Titles & 2 JMW Titles This is also the 1st none Champ or Titlist he's fought in yrs yet he still gets bashed so what are you talking about.
Ay man, that's all fine and well understood, but to be honest the point to me is, and the difference is - Understanding the reality of the world and the sport, but still speaking out against it and trying to hold up the standards and - Understanding the realities of the sport/world, and then saying, 'its fine... meh, its just the way it is' I don't get where someone goes from understanding the business and reality of the sport, to supporting it and defending it. I can understand it, while still being vocally critical of it.
Berto sucks. The fact that it's PPV sucks. And Mayweather sucks, period. Hasn't had an exciting fight since the Gatti beatdown and he's half as interesting a fighter as he was when he was at 130 lbs.
Also, its not just about not fighting his number one challenger. Its about the extreme he went in the opposite direction. Berto has had -one- half decent win in the last three years. One. And again, that was half decent at best. That is a very extreme soft fight in a division where his next fight would probably be soft anyways, in a time where he fights twice a year, and is getting the highest salary in sports to do what he does. Its really indefensible to me. Just imo.
This would make things all the more humorous if Berto gets a blessing from the spirit of Marciano. :smoke
But what standards are you holding it up against? None that has existed in the industry, I don't think. I don't recall EVER hearing this amount of grumbling about fighters who having just met the best available take a soft one pre-internet. I don't think it happened that much (though it will have happened sometimes). It took Larry YEARS to get on Hopkins for real about his level of opposition (and even then I suspect his real problem with Hopkins was his style). Usually, when a fighter matches someone not good enough AFTER taking on a massive threat there's a bit of eye rolling in the industry and then after the fight, if it's very one-sided, people will start to apply pressure where his next opponent is concerned. That tends to be the way it works. Now on message boards etc., the second, the very second that a fighter takes on someone that's not excellent regardless of the track record of that fighter people start to complain. It happened to Carl Froch for christ sake when he took on that one guy who wasn't world class and knocked him out early. Ridiculous. Mayweather has fought - COTTO (one for the industry) GUERERRO (soft) ALVAREZ (one for the industry) MAIDANA (soft) MAIDANA (one for the industry) PACQUIAO (one for the industry) BERTO (soft) Absolutely nothing wrong with that. In fact it's better than the level at which many of the other p4p guys are fighting. I'll bet he's somewhere just above the middle of the pack ****ysing the top 12 or so even after Berto. I think the "standard" that you want to hold Mayweather to didn't really exist pre-internet in a real sense. I don't think it has any resemblance to any real attitudes that have ever existed in the industry - Dempsey for example may only have engaged in soft engagements and prospered enormously. Louis fought guys way down the pecking order in voluntaries, but was careful to pick off his #1 contender every year. Ali defended against Chuvalo, Cooper, London Mildenberger and shot Williams between Liston in '65 and Terrell in '67. This is BAU and there is absolutely nothing wrong with it but because everything Pacquiao and Myaweather do gets @ssfuked three different ways by 800000 different people it's a drama. If it's the street-rip people say it is, the fight will bomb, but my guess is that like every other ATG, people buy Mayweather fights to see him win. Just like people turned out - hell, still turn out - to see ****ty orchestras play Mozart.
So it is irrational to ask the lineal 154 champ to defend his belts? NO atsch, please NO! This has got to be a new low... First Cotto is justified and defended for not defending at the MW limit, and now the lineal JrMW doesn't need to even fight there anymore even though he holds champion status simply because, well he has only fought there once in the last 3 years???!!
Other fighters seem to get credit for them. Why is that? Moisley was #3 P4P when PBF beat him. Oscar came off a destruction of Mayorga and PBF had to move up to fight him on his terms. Cotto is still on top today and is ring champ at 160. Hernandez was at the end but PBF was also green having only 18 fights.
At the end of he day he can do what he wants But it jus sheeets on all the "conditions" he stipulates for the pac fight from the time he saw cotto beaten by pac All these "Marquez" problems or "can't bring anything to the table" ETA were excuses to make until pac was on the slide He should have been consistent from the start but I guess for all these stars it's about the money - and they made more from that sheet excuse of a fight than they would have if they fought many years before (well it seems) I have a feeling he might still fight pac next year
I was as big a Mosley fan as anyone on these boards, but any ranking that had Mosley #3 P4P at that time was grossly misguided. Mosley looked sensational against Margarito a year and a half earlier, but that was the only time he had truly looked sensational since probably facing Adrian Stone, which was before 911 even happened. He looked OK against Collazo, but he had struggles in most of his other big fights during that stretch starting with Vernon. Shane probably warranted a top 10 P4P slot, at least for a year after the Margo win, but anyone who viewed him as #3 was being generous.
Im not going to debate it with ya man, if you feel he fought those names when they were in their top form (the form that built them their name in the first place) then that's how you see it I guess. None of (Cotto, Pac, Hoya, Mosley) were at their best when he fought them though. Doesn't mean he doesn't deserve credit for beating some really good fighters, just that went someone rattles off those names to make his resume sound super impressive to me its somewhat deceiving. Idk, but ya that happens with most fighters as time passes, like Joe Cal getting credit for beating 'Roy Jones'. ect, ect. Just the way it is I guess.
I think the real issue to be discussed there is that Mayweather should obviously be stripped of his titles. Ill have that talk way before I talk about how hes ducking the next vague challenger in a division he obviously doesn't actively compete at.
How do you go about getting prime versions of these guys when. Oscar wouldn't mention his name for years,Mosley had a toothache, Cotto wasn't ready and said no one ever tried to make that fight on his side, & Manny had a fear of needles that lasted until he couldn't find anyone else to fight. All these guys are ON RECORD turning down fight's in the "prime"? Fighting the absolute best version of a fighter is hard fighting them while there still on top though is what he did.