But you have to admit that Macklin was flabby in his midsection not quite in the same shape he was against Martinez and Sturm. Macklin was needlessly reckless did not fight intelligently and lost all composure, he mentally lost before he stepped in the ring. He knew Sergio had KO'd him and Sturm was wrecking his body and he was badly winded late in their fight. So obviously he knew he was screwed the moment the fight was made. Macklin was in bad shape physically and mentally with a year off ring rust, so not a great barometer of how a top tier guy will do against GGG.
Thats because his trainer gave him a bad game plan. He thought GGG was too much to box, and he needed to fight inside and smother/brawl. Which makes sense in many ways and really was the correct answer. Buddy McGirt convinced him to try and box, thinking GGG was just some hyped up power hitter. So between going against his own instincts, and finding out real quick first hand how dumb that fight plan was... obviously would not do wonders for your confidence. I do think Geale will put up a good fight, and I do think he is underestimated because he somehow lost his strat and dropped a controversial split decision to Barker. The Geale that shows up for GGG will be much more on his game. That being said, I just think there is a talent gap. I think we will also see a better GGG that rises to the occasion and puts on a virtuoso performance and shows a bit more that he has never had need to bring out. Then people who dont know what they are looking at will call Geale a bum. It is what it is. :conf
I just checked you were one of the guys saying there is a reason why Ruslan is the favorite, and that no one thinks Algieri will win. Actually on that same thread I predicted almost to perfection how that fight went and predicted a win for Algieri. So maybe your the one who doesn't know much, I never said its a guarantee but kneejerk faith in your favorite fighter does lend itself to Pavlovian thought, and lack of critical analysis.
yep and GGG will body Geale and you will be wrong. Always picking against the grain usually doesnt work.
I said kneejerk faith leads to a lack of critical analysis I feel the same way about contrarianism as well, I never make my picks based on anything but inductive reasoning. I only go against the grain if I have some form of evidence to support a seemingly illogical choice, sometimes I'm wrong but rarely. Its never a guarantee that anybody is going to win in boxing, but when you use your head and not your heart you tend to be right more often than not. Although sometimes the heart wins and mind loses you won with one of your favorites Cotto and I lost with mine Martinez.
This is like set up thread to make this win great after the fight, Geale lost to Barker seriously he has no chance, GGG is best MW in the world shame he really doesnt have anyone to fight but i would like for him to KTFO joke Quillin.
No its not I actually believe that Geale has a chance, but your right GGG destroys Quillen easily. Barker was a bad style match up for Geale, whereas Geale has potential to be bad style match up for GGG.
Maybe I have a point. Maybe he sees what I see. Golovkin plans on a patient fight not going for the KO. Golovkin said " I respect Daniel Geale very much" "Daniel is a great fighter. I have watched his tapes and the last fight in particular, makes me realize that this is not going to be an easy fight - because he has a specific style, He has proved that in his fights and it will be difficult to solve"
that's being kind... geale was awful in the first 3 and didn't go back to the body when he had barker hurt