The whole bull**** 'robbery' issue is over shadowing Bradleys performance. All credit to Bradley, if he can shorten up his punches he'll do even better in the rematch, he'll be more accurate.
There is clearly an agenda here. If you are a Floyd fan then you can find 7 close rounds to score to Bradley. In reality he won 3 rounds maximum.
He landed 10% / 11% of the jabs he thrown and landed approximately 100 punches less in the entire fight . He won three rounds.
keep acting like clowns you'll keep getting wwe like boxing ppvs the promoters are gonna keep this **** up as long as you teenie boppers keep eating it up
I`ll need to see this fight for myself... we have everyone except mayweather fans crying robbery... when I find this **** somewhere on the net & view it I`ll get back to you. Ps. maybe now pac can understand Marquez frustration a little better
Most posters in general (*****, ******* and everyone in between) that I've seen, have said Pacquiao clearly won, but where the disagreement lies is in the scoring. I don't really agree with the folks saying Bradley won, but on the other hand, Marquez soundly beat Pacquiao and Pac got the nod, so I'm not breaking any windows over this decision.
felt the same way when Marquez was robbed. and I'm a huge Pac fan. Timothy fought a smart fight when he had to. Same thing with Marquez.
Seriously, so many of you have a clear bias and can't be objective at all. It's childish and pathetic. Let's call a spade a spade, both Pac-JMM 3 and Pac-Bradley were corrupt decisions. Just because Marquez deserved to win their third fight doesn't mean Manny deserved to lose this one.