I thought Porter was gonna be weight drained!?!?!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buckdacious, Jun 23, 2015.


  1. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    You seem to have completely misunderstood his point :lol:
     
  2. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    9
    Jul 25, 2008
    Nope they try to swing the convo into a point that works for them.

    He's saying Porter looked way different and would've KO Broner if he wasnt weigh drained.

    Im saying thats the same damn Porter that fought Broner that fought Brook, only difference is Brook is a better fighter...not the 3lbs :lol::lol:

    Thats why I cant wait to drop this channel, school you cats that swear yall know boxing. Porter weigh drained :lol::lol::lol:
     
  3. YCGS

    YCGS Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,067
    1,272
    Sep 13, 2013
    Wow,no sense talking logic to a moron like you. My point was that Team BRONER thought he'd be weight drained dumba$$. Why else would they have made him come down to a weight he hadn't been at in years? Use your head FFS. It is a fact that Porter DID NOT WANT THE CATCHWEIGHT, but it was the only way he'd get the fight.

    You're another guy who doesn't get that 3 pounds is SIX glasses of water..when you are in tip top shape, all 3 of those pounds are water weight... you at least get that, don't you?? And you also know that you can't just drink the water after weigh in and be good as gold next day... it can take more than 24 hours to rebalance the body. Porter handled it well, but don't try to tell me they didn't try to drain him.
     
  4. Beatle

    Beatle Sheer Analysis Full Member

    9,270
    269
    Apr 12, 2009
    A weight-drained fighter who has lots of talent can beat a healthy fighter with little talent. That's what happened in this fight.

    Catch-weights matter. If they didn't matter, cash-cows wouldn't force their opponents to drain themselves.
     
  5. puncherschance

    puncherschance Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,818
    241
    Jul 3, 2012
    quit it w the the myth that brook schooled porter, it was a close fight w porter employing clinch tactics all night long. clinches are a valuable strategy here and there and when you get hurt, but to use it all night long a la wlad/broner/mayweather is disgraceful. i put just as much blame on porter for not having an answer and lunging into the clinches all night, either way it was still close and i would give porter a 50-50 chance in a rematch.
     
  6. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    9
    Jul 25, 2008
    Here's the problem..you think thye plan was to weigh drain him but it was only because Broner doesnt want to fight at 147.

    Thats the thing, everybody says ppl make catch weights to drain there fighter, some do but its just about being even.
     
  7. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    A 50-50 chance of winning more than 2 rounds this time? :think
     
  8. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    If anything it seemed Broner was
     
  9. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    9
    Jul 25, 2008
    :deal
     
  10. markclow

    markclow Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,368
    325
    Aug 23, 2005
    To me it is very obvious that you have never competed.

    When competitors are almost equal, 'small' advantages when you can get them matter a lot (such as having to drop a couple of pounds less than your competitor). These 'small' advantages mean a lot a the highest level and having multiple 'small' advantages really adds up.

    You consider two cyclists racing, same age, same equipment. Both practice ride 300 miles a week. One has perfected every little detail, posture, aerodynamics etc etc. One hasn't. Which one would you bet on?
     
  11. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    Man was Shawn lucky that Broner is sh*t at boxing :yep
     
  12. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,648
    18,377
    Oct 7, 2006
    :deal
     
  13. markclow

    markclow Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,368
    325
    Aug 23, 2005
    'Small advantages' are the reason why Leonard beat Hagler. As great as he was, do you really think Leonard would have got out alive against Hagler in a tiny ring without advantages?