Had Froch ahead 115-112, Dirrel just wasn't active enough too bad cause when he was he was winning. You can see he's talented and in 1 year he will be so much better than Froch. Froch is really dirty and do thing borderline like Hopkins but he's not as good though. But he is hard to fight and effective even though he looks so awkward. And Dirrel shouldn't have lost a point that was bad refering!!!!
Sorry but I do not rely on the feedback of someone who has alt accounts.... if you dont have the balls to come here as you were to discuss this stay the **** out.....
pompier - ignore bazooka i think you may find his anger is more based on a pro froch post than the fact you don't have an account. How dare you
If Dirrell wasn't active enough yet he threw more and connected more punches than Froch how could you have Froch ahead 115-112! Dirrell hurt Froch 2 times in the fight and Dirrell was never hurt!!! I'm a little confused with your scoring!?! Dirrell punches where more crisp than Froch's and he went to head and body through out the fight!!
Everybody is just going to have to get over this. Dirrell needs to figure out some way of neutralizing Abrahams fairly quick hands and straight on style. And Froch needs to pick out his funeral suit because he's a dead man when he steps in with Kessler.
Not a big fan of Froch but i can respect the fact that he is not a easy guy to fight and in somewways he is effective. And even though that dirrel is very talented, not sure he completely outboxed Froch, he did sometimes but not throughout the fight but like i said in 1 year he will be too strong for Froch because he will have experience to go with his talent. 115-112 is the score i had, maybe if i saw it again it would change a bit but at the moment that was it, i'm not saying i got the absolut truth here, juste the way i saw it.
