I was on target in my prediction of "Mayrunner-Mosley."

I don't think I've ever seen Shane hurt a guy and not be able to finish him until the fight I saw last Saturday. Floyd is no spring chicken at the age of 33 and prior to challenging Shane had only fought one opponent in 3 yrs. The age difference could be a factor but history tells us Shane doesn't do well against slick boxers with quick movement. I tend to think it was Floyd's boxing skills that made Shane look old. If Floyd had an age advantage then one can say Shane's advantage is his bigger size. I say if the majority puts Pac on the P4P throne for beating a handful of shot fighters then the same treatment should be given to Floyd. He just dominated a bigger, dangerous opponent who was at least a top 3 welterweight. That says a lot.

Who do you think can defeat Floyd? I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess your top two include Williams and Martinez. They both are talented athletes but they don't come without flaws. I'm not saying Floyd is unbeatable but he makes less errors than the two guys mentioned. Therefore I like his chances of beating them.

 

Lay off the booze.

 

flat out hater

 

runner? The mutha fu34er was pressing the fight...ur fault..dummy

 

"mayrunner"

I stopped reading there.

 

Your post failed when u said Mayrunner atsch Maychaser is more like it! :yep

 

Mr. Bill, I expected better from you than this. You have to give Floyd props for being a great fighter. He may not be the best human being, but this isn't about that. He fought a great fight and won big. I don't think this is what Frauds do. Frauds get exposed when they meet top-flight opposition.

Mosely may have gotten old overnight, but we can't say that. If he was rustly, it was his own fault for not defending his title. Mosely can blame no one but himself.

The bottom line is no one can blame Floyd for dominating his opponents. He is just better than everybody else.