I was wrong about the fight and I'm ready to eat my crow

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Pimp C, Dec 7, 2008.


  1. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    First let me say I'm a man and can admit when I was wrong. I picked Oscar to win simply because I felt the size difference would simply be too much for Pac even though Oscar was past his best. I couldn't have been more wrong. The beating Oscar took was far worse than the recent clinics Calzaghe-Jones atleast Jones knocked Joe down and worse than the beating Hopkins gave Kelly. Manny Pac beat all the odds and shocked the boxing world by doing the unthinkable in making Oscar quit a true career defing win. Congrats to Manny and his fans.

    With this said this win was Karma at the highest level for Oscar who beat a ancient Chavez and acted like he did something and then went on to rematch him and humiliate a legend even further. He was humbled like no one else has been in a long time, thank you Manny.

    I must say I have never been so happy about being wrong in a big fight for two reasons. I'm not a Oscar fan and always have thought he was overrated and his fans were as annoying as they hell. Seeing him quit on his stool and being booed in the ring after the fight for probably his last fight was like Christmas Day, New Years Eve and my birthday all wrapped up in one.:yep Second, this fight will make PBF come out of retirement for a sure mega payday and the biggest fight in boxing. In a fight that will be billed as "Who's #1".
     
  2. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,499
    14,051
    Mar 5, 2006
    didn't you boycott the fight?
     
  3. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    The great thing about this fight was it was all or nothing. Whoever you picked you were gonna look a fool if you got it wrong. Pacquiao might have got blown away by the bigger man since there were a few unknowns with whether he could take a shot, and us Pacquiao pickers would look like clowns.

    Then on the other side all the Oscar pickers are talking about size, how big Oscar is and how small Pacquiao is. When Pacquiao's path to victory used his size to his advantage, his natural quickness, his ability to see slower guys punches coming and his lack of height meaning Oscar had to hit down.

    Thats boxing.
     
  4. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    I went to watch at friends house who threw a fight party. I couldn't resist.:lol:
     
  5. standing 8

    standing 8 Active Member Full Member

    1,396
    0
    Sep 9, 2007
    I too was wrong and I'm very happy about it.
     
  6. eltorrente

    eltorrente Active Member Full Member

    1,231
    1
    May 18, 2006
    I don't understand why so many people thought DLH was going to win based simply on the size difference. Never made any sense to me - given the fact that Pac was simply more skilled and DLH was a bit past his prime, slower, and over-confident. I just always thought Pac was going to win handily, and this is yet another example of people being fixated on someone's size.
     
  7. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    Very true it was satisfying. I picked DLH inside of 8 but rooted against him for even wanting to make it happen. I'm glad DLH took nothing away from anybody but the WW limit really did him in so all in all he got what was coming.
     
  8. Monstar

    Monstar The Future.. Full Member

    11,166
    0
    Oct 10, 2007
    i can respect that, you aint like some of the other clowns who just said "so he was shot" or some other dumb ****...... if you real give it where it due, props
     
  9. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    I hear ya but that was a huge size difference that I simply couldn't overlook. I felt it would be key since Manny had only fought at 135 once and I never thought much of Diaz to begin with.
     
  10. borj

    borj the Pacific Storm Full Member

    2,669
    1
    Sep 3, 2008
    thanks guys for being a man
     
  11. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    Chavez was only 33 years old when Oscar beat him. Chavez was also the Champ at the time and high on the Pd 4 pd list. Oscar is going to be 36 years old within 2 months, and had only won 50% of his fights over the last 5 years. Quite a difference.
     
  12. borj

    borj the Pacific Storm Full Member

    2,669
    1
    Sep 3, 2008
    agree
     
  13. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    I agree that Pac has more skills and has improved on them fight after fight. He has the right jabs in his arsenal now, double left straights, left uppercuts, improved defense and footwork, more balance, etc. He also counterpunched. This a new Pac, I should say. He has kept on improving. I think he will finally KOd talkative Marquez in a rematch.
     
  14. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    Well to be fair he also came in at the lightest weight he'd been in a decade or more.

    We all saw how that worked out for Chris Byrd and Roy Jones. Going back down in weight at that age is a bad idea.

    The one advantage DLH had here was size and he blew it. He actually came in lighter than Manny Pacquiao. Figure that one out.
     
  15. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    So what was a greater accompplishment DLH/Chavez or DLH/Pacman? I really can't answer this now because I thought the WW limit really did DLH in but I'm not here to take anything away from Pac.