I will always be a samuel peter fan

Rubbish. Peter was a much better fighter in 2005.

 

peter from 2005 vs th david tua of 2001?

who do you got?

 

Like when he was beating guys like julius Long, and getting hammered by Wlad?

 

Obviously he wasn't the savior of the division, but he was clearly much fresher (fitter), younger and more confident than the current version. You don't need to be a genius to see that.

 

everybody loves somebody sometime.......

 

Probably Tua by close decision. Although that wasn't Tua at his best, he had too good a chin for Peter to hurt him, and his superior handspeed and combination punching would have allowed him to edge out most of the exchanges.

No doubt it would be a great scrap to watch.

 

I'm confused, what is there to like about him as a boxer? I mean he doesn't show any hunger, or passion, he's fat, lazy, slow, and my list could go on and on.....:deal

 

tua and peter should fight now. "The Battle of the Bulged" LMAO!!!!

 

I'm still a fan but I'm left with a sense of dissapointment after he fought Chambers.

 

even that version of tua being 15-20lbs past his best fighting weight would blast peter IMO i say peter last 8 rounds

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

your are truly a ****ing clown i guess you just hang out at the trailor park for fun



:thumbsup

 

you must be a african, he has no discipline and the thinks hes better then what he really is.if you can box you can beat peter.james toney proved that, peter gets to many gifts and to many close losses accept the one from vital.

james toney beat him once, thus should have neva been a rematch!
peter loss to mcline as well !
of course the klit bros own him and so did chambers, im done with peter, i been done with peter since the james toney fights.