Ibeabuchi: Facts vs myth.

I'm curious to know why do you consider Peter a better fighter than Ike.

 

You're naming fighters that each has fought, but there is not one common opponent. So that is irrelevant. Talk about their skillsets and physical attributes. Klits fans are the first to say that they can and could've beat every fighter that ever existed because that are 6'6 plus.

Peter might have had an edge in power, but Ike was not far behind. He was more accurate. Had better footwork. Incredible stamina. A proven granite chin. Was physically strong. Moved side to side. IMO he was ions above Peter.

 

Ike vs Tua punchstats broke all sorts of records.

Ike clearly had better stamina than Sam & was a much better fighter.

 

Was he punching with his eyes closed?

 

Exactly! This was no stop punching.

 

:huh Could you expand on that a little?

 

:roflatsch Fighting close up throwing 100s of punches a round isn't as draining as this apparently.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0sFZWczB9c[/ame]

 

The idea that Peter had better stamina than Ibeabuchi is nonsensical. Nothing about either says that. Peter struggled at a decent pace whereas Ibeabuchi had a record breaking output.

Making that point just screams of ignorance. It's like saying "Frazier hit harder than Ali, had a better body attack, better stamina...oh, and he had a better right hand". You know when someone is blatantly lying in order to bolster their point.

Ibeabuchi had clearly better stamina. There is no debate about this.

 

how you in any way shape or form can compare the fat slow footed and slow handed sam peter to ibeabuchi is ridiculous and its so out of left field you dont deserve the privilege of punctuation

 

Bubby is either a troll, or an idiot. He actually Ike and Peter were the same type of fighter. Another **** to add to the list...