TONIGHT Daniel Geale vs Eromosele Albert IBF middleweight title Eromosele Albert AGE 37 BOXREC rating of #47 :rofl his last 7 fights 2008-05-17 This content is protected 2008-09-23 This content is protected 2009-01-16 This content is protected This content is protected and This content is protected 2009-08-15 This content is protected 2009-10-16 This content is protected 2010-11-19 This content is protected 18-2-1 This content is protected 2011-02-11 This content is protected This content is protected ( This content is protected win in last 7 fights) REWARD for winning 3 fights out of 7 and all 3 wins are guys not in the top 100... :good This content is protected
Geale is on the back of beating Karmazin and Sylvester (in Germany). It's the first defence of his title. He's allowed a gimme. If he fights someone on the same level in his next defence, I'll be the first to criticise.
martinez onlee fot 3 times at middlew8 2wud that be so bad jeenyus? how about $ who never fite at 168 ether?
Geale doesn´t even try to hide that he ducked out of fights with Maravilla and Sturm because he wants to keep his paper belt as a hostage in Australia as long as possible with showcase fights against fake contenders..
I like Geale, but I can't defend him or the IBF who sactioned this bout on this. Fortunately it's a easy pick in "Kirk's Championships"... Another W + KO in the making :tong
He deserves a gimme but if he goes onto have a run like Ricky Burns WBO defences (Evansen-Larayea-Cook) then he deserves some abuse.
PATHETIC atsch so beating Karmazin who at 38 and owner of "4" middleweight wins and Sylvester who is average at best...i can see how this guy is so exhausted from the elite level of fighters hes been facing :bart There are gimmes and there is utter ****...he should be embarrassed to fight a guy thats hasnt beaten a ranked guy under 140.....i mean really?? whatever...the dude was knocked out by jnior middle james kirkland in 1 round not long ago ! :rofl
Ugh, you're tedious to say the least. You know this is professional boxing, it's their livelihood. Now as a boxing fan I don't want to see **** fights, but I understand that boxers have to secure their futures. I don't throw my toys out of the pram when a boxer who worked himself into a mandatory position before winning a title takes an easy first defence. Go away and have a cry for yourself mate.
He's not the mandatory. IBF states that mandatory challengers be ranked in the top 13, if I remember correctly. Their site is down, so I can't check the rule at the moment.