IBF VS WBC which is better?.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by monaim, Nov 16, 2023.


Page 3 of 3
  1. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,639
    18,433
    Jun 25, 2014

    When you strip the first unified welterweight champion in forever who won the title in the ring ... and announce you're going to strip the first Unified heavyweight champion in 20+ years as soon as he wins all the belts ... in a span of a few weeks ...

    What do you expect?

    Sanctioning bodies are there to rate fighters. They're supposed to recognize the champion in the division and his top challengers.

    Not strip unified champs the moment they win belts because they have rules.

    If the IBF had ANY track record AT ALL of stripping a champ for someone who was far more deserving ... that would be one thing.

    But they're stripping Hall of Famers in favor of their crappy top contenders, most of whom haven't even been able to manage to win the vacant belt after the WBA strips the Hall of Famer.
     
    Dubblechin, Nov 16, 2023
    Dubblechin, Nov 16, 2023
    #31
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  2. I Dont Play With Dolls

    I Dont Play With Dolls Member Full Member

    177
    321
    Oct 17, 2021
    I Be Fooked vs We Be Crooks

    but yea IBF is better by miles.

    WBC protecting their champs against competition and allowing them special cherry picking status is disgraceful.
     
    I Dont Play With Dolls, Nov 16, 2023
    I Dont Play With Dolls, Nov 16, 2023
    #32
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,507
    15,917
    Jul 19, 2004
    Quasi related.

    This content is protected


    But they all suck. The WBA has long been the worst of the bunch. But the other 3 ain't far behind.

    They're all hopelessly corrupt.
     
    Rumsfeld, Nov 16, 2023
    Rumsfeld, Nov 16, 2023
    #33
    Clinton and heerko koois like this.
Page 3 of 3