IBO The Worse cancer in all boxing

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JohnWilkin, May 18, 2016.


  1. JohnWilkin

    JohnWilkin Member Full Member

    268
    4
    Mar 4, 2016
    And I'm saying that having been a fan since the late 60's.
     
  2. JohnWilkin

    JohnWilkin Member Full Member

    268
    4
    Mar 4, 2016
    I started a work, in March nine years ago to "echelon" boxing. I plan to showcase that!
     
  3. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,458
    5,792
    Mar 8, 2008
  4. Limerickbox

    Limerickbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,205
    4,236
    Jul 18, 2015
    So some sanctioning body that no one cares about is the "worst cancer in all boxing"?

    OK then
     
  5. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,915
    Apr 14, 2009
    Boxing's cancer is CORRUPTION!!! Its rampant from the State Commissions down Needs an International Commission consisting of HONEST Men who love the sport
     
  6. FrancescoD

    FrancescoD Active Member Full Member

    711
    53
    Mar 24, 2014
    To call the IBO cancer could not be further from the truth it is the least corrupt of all the sanction bodies in fact all the rules are fair and the one people should get behind.
     
  7. KelandBeave

    KelandBeave Fab 4 Full Member

    3,238
    662
    Jun 27, 2013
    You are kidding right, you do see what's been happening down in Australia with Danny Green and Daniel Geale and co right?

    Phil Austin gives every Tom, **** and Harry an IBO ranking and shot at the title
     
  8. FrancescoD

    FrancescoD Active Member Full Member

    711
    53
    Mar 24, 2014
    No he does'nt. The rankings are produced by boxrec with the champions of the WBA WBC WBO and IBF taken out.
     
  9. Mexi-Box

    Mexi-Box Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,809
    8
    Apr 19, 2013
    :lol: how can you be a fan of a sanctioning body? Makes no sense.
     
  10. KelandBeave

    KelandBeave Fab 4 Full Member

    3,238
    662
    Jun 27, 2013
    Paul Briggs????

    Hadn't fought in 3.5yrs after being retired due to a neurological problem, gets a ranking by the IBO at a weight he has never fought at and a crack at Danny Greens IBO cruiserweight title...... care to challenge that mate?
     
  11. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,602
    Jul 22, 2004
    John, John, John.

    Go and eat your crisps, John.
     
  12. Glassbrain

    Glassbrain Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,013
    2,046
    Apr 9, 2016
  13. The Professor

    The Professor Socialist Ring Leader Staff Member

    31,724
    23,091
    Sep 29, 2008
    This does not seem to accord with reality. The WBA, WBC, IBF and WBO are all more harmful because they are more powerful and influential in corrupting the sport.
     
  14. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    404,288
    86,374
    Nov 30, 2006
    This is like saying Mark Bellhorn was the all-time biggest cancer in the Red Sox lineup. :?

    Or that Chauncey Welliver is the GOAT malignant tumor on the HW division.

    Or that Moloch was the most nefarious villain in the 80's 'present day' setting of The Watchmen. (although in fairness he was, biologically at least, essentially one giant cancer-cell at that stage)

    There is a threshold of irrelevancy below which you can't be all that bad, no?
     
  15. FrancescoD

    FrancescoD Active Member Full Member

    711
    53
    Mar 24, 2014
    Boxrec did not produce the ratings then. IWBR was doing them. It was a calamity of a decision to allow Paul Briggs I agree. Neither Ed Levine or myself had any idea that Paul Briggs had neurological problems. Whilst he was inactive he was a good fighter in his prime and comebacking fighters get a provisional ranking when they announce their intention to fight. Paul Briggs had a ranking of 49 so was eligilble to contest with Danny Green. Yes I agree did the IBO a lot of harm, but it wasn't corrupt as it was within the rules. The Briggs affair prompted the tightning of the compliance rules.