Ideal size for future HW contenders?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by markusmaar, Nov 21, 2008.


  1. Sakura

    Sakura Boxing Addict banned

    3,605
    7
    Nov 22, 2006
    Klitchkos are not perfect fighter and neither are anybody else..
     
  2. Arka

    Arka New Member Full Member

    0
    7
    Sep 26, 2008
    From Boxrec ,I think about 35 fights before he met Tyson and about 30 KOs.
    One of his decisions was against an old Jimmy Young interestingly.

    BTW I'm not rating Tyson ahead of Ali,Louis,Holmes,Foreman or Lewis if you are curious.
     
  3. Arka

    Arka New Member Full Member

    0
    7
    Sep 26, 2008
    No,but if Wlad had learnt some of the professional know how early in his career he could have been a far greater fighter.Apart from his chin(which is an important thing admitedly),he is more physically talented than his brother.
     
  4. Sakura

    Sakura Boxing Addict banned

    3,605
    7
    Nov 22, 2006
    His opponents before Tyson was not so impressive..hardly even gate keepers.
     
  5. guncho

    guncho next champion! Full Member

    4,963
    514
    Oct 15, 2007
    I think today small HW is 6"2' and 230 lbs

    Ideal would be 6'4" and 240!
     
  6. Sakura

    Sakura Boxing Addict banned

    3,605
    7
    Nov 22, 2006
    Like i sayed they have their blunders too..wlad was youngest superheavyweight olympic gold medallist ever (age 20) and he turn pro quickly. -96 3 fights, -97 13 fights, -98 9 fights...
     
  7. swedeone

    swedeone Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,227
    3
    Dec 4, 2004
    6'6" at least... to have any shot at challenging the K brothers. Their height advantage is so underrated. It is far and away their biggest advantage over 90% of their opponents.
     
  8. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
  9. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    6'3 225lbs, my kinda heavyweight. :smoke
     
  10. FourtyOunce

    FourtyOunce Stick Ninja Full Member

    6,881
    3
    Mar 15, 2008
    if you wanna be a good heavy you need to be no shorter than 6'4 235
     
  11. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    The man in your avatar would clean house today.
     
  12. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    The latest RING magazine top 10 heavyweights includes Wlad Klitschko (#1) at 6'6, Vitali Klitschko (#2) at 6'8, Nicolay Valuev (#4) at 7' +, and Alexander Dimitrenko (#10) at 6'7

    But Chagaev (#3) is only 6'1, Povetkin (#5) is 6'2, Peter (#7) is 6'1, and Maskaev (#8) and Gomez (#9) are 6'3

    There's no one under 6 foot, but all the contenders when Tyson came along were well over 6' as well.

    It's true that some of these Ukrainians and Russians are very tall but they haven't all proven to be particularly good fighters. valuev is massive but lost to a guy 6'1. The Klitschko brothers are good but they've both lost to guys smaller than themselves.
     
  13. drama

    drama Active Member Full Member

    506
    0
    Jan 21, 2008
    non sense these guys have yet to come up against a really good opponent when they do we'll see how important height is.
     
  14. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Man, you little ******. If you think a 6'7" robot is a master boxer, you're ******ed.
     
  15. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    So just because he's 6'7 he can't be skilled?:think