If 2005 Morales (of Pac 1) was a jr-ww, who'd win between him and Khan (of Maidana)?

Go watch the Raheem fight. He had is hands at his sides, basically inviting Morales to hit him and he couldnt do it.

Khan was faster and more powerful then Raheem. While Raheem might have slight technical advantages in being more of a slickster, Khan is without a doubt the better fighter, and Khans range would cause heeps of problems for Morales.


Khan has flaws. But he is far far better then Haye or DeGale. And I cant for the life of me see why the British support for Khan as dwindled, while they like frauds like those two. :think

 

khan fights nothing like raheem you **** child, khan is not a counter puncher.

 

because idiots like you support him.:deal

 

Morales TKO inside 10rounds, easy :bbb

 

You're really gonna play the abc game?

Morales beat pac; pac> khan.

Morales lost to raheem; raheem>prescott.

Accept you're wrong here. I messed up placing oscar above jones and I accept I was wrong and you were right

 

YOu think Raheem beat Morales because he was countring him? :rofl


Go watch the fight. Deedeedee.


Raheem is literally making every novice mistake in the book against Morales. Dropping his hands, throwing wide looping punches, throwing lead uppercuts, yet he gets away with it because Morales is weight drained and shot to pieces. And cant fight a fighter with movement and speed anymore.

But he beats Khan. Who is far superior to Raheem in every category, save maybe a little bit on the technical side, as if Raheem was a technical mastr or something. :-(

 

YOu're a ******. Im not playing the ABC game. Im playing the styles make fights game moron.

Morales was shot and weight drained and naturally would struggle with fighters with speed. Meanwhile he looks good against offensive fighters with defensive flaws. ala Maidana and Pacquiao.

YOu do see the differene between Maidana and Raheem dont you moron?

 

i think 2005 vwesion of morales would beat any version of pacquiao so yeah hed ****ing smoke khan

 

So pac didn't have speed when morales beat him?

This is getting too easy.

 

Do you know the difference between fighting at range, and what Pacquiao does? You dont see how Raheem used his speed advantage to the best degree, and Pacquiao didnt coming in wild as he usually does?

Yeah to easy ******. :rofl

 

Michiganwarrior: Mayweather is a better body puncher then Pacquiao

Poppykins: Buh Buh Pacquiao hits harder to the body then Mayweather!


MichiganWarrior: This isnt about who hits harder, its about who the better body puncher is. Floyd has far better technique, and utilizes body punching more in his fight plans.


Poppykins: :|:|:|:|

 

As far as i saw this thread was about Morales, no need to bring Mayweather rinto this thread.