If Berto and Peterson had been tested under USADA

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by janeschicken, Nov 20, 2012.


  1. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    ... would we even know today if they had tested Positive?

    :think
     
  2. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    Yes you ****ing mong

    Its in their best interests to catch dirty fighters



    Shows their tests work u loon
     
  3. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    :lol:

    Someone hasn't read Hauser's latest article apparently.
     
  4. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    if nobody squealed about the positive result like in erik's case, then gbp would likely not have revealed the result and let the fight go on.

    ...or usada could have destroyed the samples as in the winky-quillin's case.
     
  5. SMS Employee

    SMS Employee Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,956
    2
    Nov 18, 2012
    yes we would have BUT after the fights though.
     
  6. SMS Employee

    SMS Employee Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,956
    2
    Nov 18, 2012
    I know this as my boss 50 told me that this is the standard procedure for GBP and positive tests. Floyd is protected from this though as lets face it, he's the cash cow in boxing. 50 said not to worry, he is working on a masterplan to expose the secret dealings between these parties.
     
  7. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    we also have to remember that hauser has an open challenge to oscar to sign a release of all his tests...so far, oscar has not agreed.
     
  8. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    **** am I behind the on the gossip?


    Sue me. It wont even be relevant next week.
     
  9. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    Why is VADA vs USADA the relevant difference when Ockham would suggest promotional affiliation is just as likely an explanation, if not more so, for the divergent results?
     
  10. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    schaefer would have been notified and USADA would destroy the samples. we would have never known because shaefer and haymon would have covered it up.
     
  11. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Where's the link that its fact Mayweather tested positive for using PED's?



    *******ism at its very finest folks!!!!:yep
     
  12. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    USADA & VADA are a joke.
    Those tests are ****.
     
  13. uraharakisuke

    uraharakisuke Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,518
    0
    Jan 10, 2010
    Where's the link that its fact Manny tested positive for using PED's?



    *****tardation at its very finest folks!!!!:yep
     
  14. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Nobody has ever accused Pacquiao of testing positive.

    Manny Pacquiao has said no to more modernized methods of PED testing, and thats the reason why he's been given so much grief. That ******* is fact!!!!!!:deal
     
  15. KasperLokz13

    KasperLokz13 Aztec Warrior Full Member

    204
    0
    Nov 10, 2012
    neither Berto or Peterson were GBP fighters when they were found dirty. so i you're using these two fighters as an example of corruption from GBP and USADA your logic fails.