If Boxing Did Away With "Super" and "Junior"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Butch Coolidge, Nov 19, 2017.


Do Away With Super/ Junior?

  1. yes

    20 vote(s)
    62.5%
  2. No

    12 vote(s)
    37.5%
  1. Butch Coolidge

    Butch Coolidge Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,305
    2,626
    Jul 20, 2004
    Would professional boxing be better if the sport eliminated weight divisions that had "super" or "junior" in it?
     
    Brixton Bomber likes this.
  2. Tazz

    Tazz Member Full Member

    376
    397
    Dec 24, 2009
    I don't think so. Less weight divisions would just give bigger advantages to people who are already big at their weights.
     
  3. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,372
    7,203
    Nov 22, 2014
    Yes. All it does is split up divisions and dilute what it means to be champion. 147 and 160 would be highly competitive divisions with mediocre divisions like 140 and 154. The Cruiserweight division also needs to go.
     
    Robney and Willie Maeket like this.
  4. Butch Coolidge

    Butch Coolidge Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,305
    2,626
    Jul 20, 2004
    Getting rid of the cruiserweight division could conceivably have a 176lber fighting a 240lber.

    :ambulance:
     
    bubbrubb and Flamazide like this.
  5. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,832
    20,260
    Apr 3, 2012
    It would be more difficult for a champion to make an easy defense, but the amount of stalling out by contenders awaiting title shots would be no good.
     
  6. Willie Maeket

    Willie Maeket "40 Acres and Mule" -General William T. Sherman Full Member

    13,898
    8,374
    Jun 22, 2015
    Well the most celebrated 188 lb heavyweight champion , Rocky Maricano went 49-0 as a light heavyweight arguably. I never have seen the point of a cruiser weight division when they come to the ring as heavyweight's on fight night.

    Thats just a division where sissies hide out at pretending to be fighters while watching the REAL MEN at heavyweight fight for world supremacy. Thats how that fake male model, David Haye, conned his way into a lucrative Klitschko fight without ever really having a hard fight.
     
    Dfaulds and Jackomano like this.
  7. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,152
    Dec 23, 2013
    YOu can fix that with same day weigh ins. Im all for cutting divisions and same day weigh ins. Also no more belts ffs!
     
    Robney, Willie Maeket and FuMaster like this.
  8. JohnnyDrama99

    JohnnyDrama99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,398
    904
    Nov 24, 2012
    It worked before. Less divisions would be less complex. I wish they only had one world title for each weight class
     
    bubbrubb and like a boss like this.
  9. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon.

    36,601
    40,217
    Aug 28, 2012
    Deeper more talent rich divisions with fewer places to duck and hide would be great for boxing.
     
    bubbrubb and Willie Maeket like this.
  10. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    31,539
    7,520
    Oct 5, 2009
    may be not all of them but the small ones separated by like 3 pounds can go
     
  11. like a boss

    like a boss have gloves will travel Full Member

    14,570
    11,423
    Jul 30, 2012
    Any lessening of the number of the belt holders would be an improvement. But one belt holder in each existing weight division would be a bigger improvement than reducing the number of weight divisions.
     
    Pez, Gneus7, bubbrubb and 4 others like this.
  12. khaosai galaxi

    khaosai galaxi Superbad Full Member

    2,977
    2,509
    Apr 17, 2017
    I agree, or instead of 4 big organisation and a few minor ones, how about just 2 belt holders per division and incentives given for unification bout. I don't know what type of incentives, maybe some can suggest.
     
  13. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    1,741
    Jan 4, 2007
    The problem is there are a lot more boxers today than in the past. The fewer the divisions the less chance to be the world champions.
     
  14. DonnyMo

    DonnyMo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,629
    2,278
    Feb 21, 2011
    Why even have two? If you can have two "world champions" then you might as well just have 6 of them.

    Let's go back to when boxing was truly great and was the most popular sport in America.

    ONE world champion per weight class, 8 divisions, same day weigh-ins. It's very ****ing simple. This sport would be electric overnight.

    Just scrolling over the list of current boxing "champions" it's downright laughable -- Jeff Horn, Robert Easter, George Groves walk around this Earth calling themselves "World Champions" lolol.
     
  15. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    36,619
    21,415
    Jul 29, 2004
    And Charles Martin used to walk the earth as a god.