If Boxing was Scored by result not Rounds

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by KO KIDD, Mar 30, 2010.


  1. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,273
    5,897
    Oct 5, 2009
    As we all know boxing is scored round by round and many fights are close and many fans scream foul when a guy loses but wins the later rounds and does damage.

    What if boxing was scored by who the ref or judges thought won after the conclusion of the entire fight.

    What fights would have a reversed score.

    Would Hopkins have won against Taylor

    Had Meldrick Taylor survived Chavez would have got the nod

    Balboa over Creed

    Any other reversals you guys would see

    I'm not promoting this kind of scoring but just thought it could be interesting.
     
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Jose Luis Ramirez took over the 2nd half of the fight against Edwin Rosario in their first bout. I thought Ramirez won it, but the judges gave it to El Chapo.

    I think it was in PR so that helped.
     
  3. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    The fighter with the more messed up face loses
     
  4. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Look at Michael Katsidis and Czar Amonsot's faces after their fight.
     
  5. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,273
    5,897
    Oct 5, 2009
    Any fights come to mind though
     
  6. Prescott_Fan

    Prescott_Fan Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,554
    0
    Sep 9, 2008
    You could win the first 10 rounds and then lose the last 2 clearly and potentially lose the fight, which would be a bit unfair. No system is perfect, but the current one is about as good as it's going to get. Saying that i'd prefer it if judges were actually allowed to still score rounds even from time to time as a lot of the time that is why you get odd scoring sometimes with rounds being given one way or the other when in reality nobody really won the round.
     
  7. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,273
    5,897
    Oct 5, 2009
    Like your point on even rounds
     
  8. h13vyy

    h13vyy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,689
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    Good point. Imagine a fight where one fighter just about takes a close contested 6 rounds 10-9 and the other fighter wins the final 6 rounds 10-9 convinvingly, should the fight be a draw?
     
  9. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    That's very vague.

    I wouldn't want fight outcomes to rely on how the judges or ref "felt" after the fight, scorecards have to be kept.

    But I would prefer if a fighter got an extra point for clearly winning a round, as opposed to just win a close round. That way clear rounds would matter more than close rounds and the scores would be fairer.

    There was a recent article on ESB.com that suggested something like this and I found it very interesting.
     
  10. dubace

    dubace Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,807
    2
    Oct 21, 2009
    hopkins vs calzaghe
    dirrell vs froch
    this scoring system would probably be a bit more accurate.
     
  11. dubace

    dubace Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,807
    2
    Oct 21, 2009
    agreed.
     
  12. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Sure. That's why people ***** about the Taylor-Hopkins results, or Cotto-Clottey. In the latter, Clottey obviously was the one who did more damage, but he did most of that damage in 5 rounds, plus he was knocked down, and he very clearly lost 5 rounds simply due to lack of activity.
     
  13. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    Jones Tarver I, might have gone to Tarver under those circumstances.
     
  14. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010

    The problem with the scoring is it's lack of flexibility. It forces 10-9 rounds, even when a round is "just about even". Allowing half 9 (or even quarter) points would do a lot to help scoring. Adding a 4th judge and throwing out the "outlier" score would also help.
     
  15. dubace

    dubace Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,807
    2
    Oct 21, 2009
    good point