IF Bradley "won" then Cotto KTFO Mayweather...

If you think Bradley got a draw... well then you don't know **** about boxing fella!! :rofl :deal I know much more about Baaaxing than you or your momma!

 

Yes it was kinda like the Rios-Abril fight... Or Williams-Lara!! Take your pick... Bradley won because some old man had him winning.. the scores didn't reflect what went on in the ring! atsch

 

Nah...its a horror flick. :-(

 

Bradley had more success with Manny than Cotto with Mayweather.

Marquez beat Manny and was robbed though.

 

A lot like Marquez Pacquiao 3.

 

If you think Manny did not lose to Marquez in the 3rd fight then you don't know **** about boxing.

 

That fight was close but not a robbery! atsch

 

You know boxing yet you think Bradly got a draw. That's means your ******ed.

 

Only *******s say that. Everything that is being said about this fight is being said about the Marquez Pacquiao 3 fight at the time.

You may not like it but it's the truth. Manny got his ass beat by Marquez.

No matter how you like at it Manny is 1-1 in his last 2 fights.

He officially beat Marquez but lost to Timmy.

He unofficially lost to Marquez but beat Timmy.

So there goes that.:blurp

Pacquiao won something like 9-3.

Marquez won something like 9-3.

Both were robberies man.

Your boy lost either way you want to look at it now deal with it and shut the **** up.

 

Ok well your ******ed and know nothing about boxing if you think Pacuiao won against Marquez 3. That fight wasn't even close.

 

I agree

 

I gave Cotto 3 rounds and gave Bradley 4 rounds......buuuuut the rounds Cotto won were more obvious and clearer wins. All in all they're pretty even.......but boxing is scored on a round by round basis not a damage basis. Bradley made more rounds close than Cotto but Cotto won the rounds he won by bigger margins. Mayweathers offense was much more effective than Pacs, Cotto's offense was more effective than Bradleys. Mayweather was in a real fight, Pac was in a sparring match where he let his foot off the gas.

 

cotto was way more competitive with mayweather than bradley, cotto was trying to win bradley was trying to survive, mayweather had to step it up to win, manny was taking a rest he had it so in hand, smacking his gloves together and letting bradley hit him to try and make it more interesting.

 

Arum said that “if Manny wants a rematch then that’s what we’ll do. We have the right to affect a rematch. It's going to be his call.”

However made it clear that while Pacquiao will be the draw “you have to compensate for the extra money that Bradley will get. In others words Manny will get far more money than Bradley but he’ll have to absorb the extra money we pay Bradley.”


SO WAS IT ALL ALONG BOB???? MANNY GETS A LOWER PURSE NEXT TIME AROUND AND YOU POCKET IT???

http://philboxing.com/news/story-71623.html

 

Cotto was arguably level going into round 9 Bradley was arguably on his was to getting KTFO going into round 1-12

As for his dominance of the later rounds this was because manny took his foot off the pedal and was blatantly carrying Bradley. Bradley was using his weak as jabs and flapping a lot although to his credit he did also have some nice flurries and was more active due to manny's inactivity. I think manny just got bored and lost his killer instinct.