There can be little doubt among those of us who watched the first six rounds that kell is a superior boxer to errol spencer. He was bouncing the American all over the ring, picking him off with ease. The American got desperate and swung a few windmills which somehow connected, leaving the superior Englishman with a debilitating handicap. Given that even after this freak injury he was still frequently checking his outmatched opponent there is literally no doubt who' have won. To answer the question in the thread title I think kell was starting to exert a bit more pressure and I'd have been Surprised if the now derailed hype train would have gone past the ninth.
I'm a Brook fan and unfortunately I must have seen a different fight to you.. Brook seemed tired due to either body shots or weight cut, maybe both. Spence also took a few early rounds cos Brook kept finding himself on ropes. Spence is really good at cutting off rope and Brook used great movement to get out of the inside, But every now and then he got stuck there. I had Spence up 96-93 and couldn't see how the momentum would shift other than a big risk-it-all approach of Brook going for a KO. Similar to AJ when he risked it v Wlad
lmmgao, Spence proved who wss superior in rounds 1 thru 11. he's just flat out greater, brook can hold his head up knowing he lost to two men he cannot beat now nor ever. no biggie. I'd love for brook to sucker Pac in to a "comeback" fight. seems he's get major props from fans once he runs Pac into the ground or out the door of the arena.. is there any guaranteed victory that would do more for him ? doubt Khan is on that level, but Khan is a much tougher out
p can you send me a link to this version, they obviously paid SHO & YouTube to rub this special performance out
no, he wasnt standing, he was just letting everyone know he was about to go sit in his corner and make the beating stop. he had good reason to go look for his stool.
