unfortunately, it is another no-win situation for Joe. If he beats Dawson, the blood curdling cries of "overhype" from the haters will ring throughout esb for weeks and months, if not years. he should fight the winner of bhop and dawson.
Funny logic around here, Joe is getting put down with people sayin he only beat people that were way past it so he has to prove himself against Dawson, the Dawson who is being heralded with a great resume? A resume that is so good cause it includes beating Harding Tarver and Johnson, excuse me but aren't these 3 guys also considered old and past it as well? Also considering Hopkins beat Johnson and Tarver easily and Joe beat Hopkins, yet he has to prove himself against Dawson, shouldn't it be more like dawson needs to prove he can hangwith JC?