If Canelo loses to Trout

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ElTrigueno, Feb 15, 2013.


  1. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    you really shouldn't go based off a highlight video

    Just look at Ward vs Abe

    [yt]LSEpCdA7n3c[/yt]

    you'd think it was a tough fight for Ward when it was a vry wide decision
     
  2. Delroc

    Delroc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,324
    7
    Jan 14, 2009
    I'm actually going off the whole cotto fight but i just posted the highlight. which is really a trout highlight.

    Ill admit I've only seen trout in the cotto fight but i believe that is the most relevant fight to this upcoming match anyway. and i think its safe to say its his best performance.
     
  3. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    When I picked Trout to beat Canelo by TKO they thought it was a joke I hope those same people read this post you made great points.
     
  4. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    Common sense here... if Trout can't KO Alvarez there is NO ****ING WAY he is walking away with the W. Too much money riding on the ginger's future in the sport.
     
  5. Ianian58

    Ianian58 Active Member Full Member

    680
    2
    Oct 16, 2012
    Don't know why people would chose Canelo, nothing inicated he would win.
     
  6. alakran

    alakran Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,464
    442
    Aug 31, 2011
    You can bet after that though, Trout suddenly becomes an overrated bum whose best win was a shopworn blown-up Cotto.[/QUOTE]
    i was thinking about that earlier too, Trout hasnt done anything other than beat Cotto and it wasnt like he beat him 12-0, COtto is a blown up Welterweight who hasnt beaten a good fighter at 154, Canelo is a little bigger and has power to get Trouts respect i think at the least it should be a 50/50 fight
     
  7. alakran

    alakran Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,464
    442
    Aug 31, 2011
    I think if Golden Boy is putting Canelo in there with Trout its because their at least 90% sure he can win if not they wouldnt do it
     
  8. Thom

    Thom Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,621
    21
    Jun 25, 2006
    He won't lose.

    Trout can't KO him, and they're ain't no way in hell that he's going to lose a decision.
     
  9. Mamerto

    Mamerto Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,005
    1
    Sep 11, 2011
  10. dwighttsharpe

    dwighttsharpe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,306
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    That's what they said when he fought Cotto.
     
  11. Eastcoast

    Eastcoast Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,763
    2
    Dec 1, 2005
    Big difference is Cotto already had his mega fight with FMJ. GB would stand to lose millions if Trout wins. Trout beating Cotto didn't cost them much. Cotto-Alvarez still wouldn't have been ppv due to Cotto losing to FMJ.
     
  12. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    242
    Sep 28, 2007
    IF Canelo losses to Trout GBP's brings in Cotto & they make huge business together.
    Or the WBC orders Lara Vs. Alvarez or rematch with Trout.

    Mayweather fight would be lost tho.
     
  13. steviebruno

    steviebruno ESB NYC Delegate banned Full Member

    3,967
    1,064
    Dec 1, 2012
    This fight is a calculated risk for Canelo. If he could really lose it, his people wouldn't be making it.
     
  14. benebox

    benebox Active Member Full Member

    889
    7
    Apr 11, 2012
    Trout can fall back on a rematch with Cotto
     
  15. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,669
    12
    Feb 4, 2010
    Going by this, go watch Canelo vs Gomez and ask yourself how much skilled Trout is compared to Alfonso